Antioxidant activity of the berries of Lonicera L. under the conditions of Central Yakutia
https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2020-25-4-7
Abstract
The total antioxidant activity (TOA) of ethanolic and water successive extracts of Lonicera leaves and berries was studied. A spectrophotometric determination of TOA by DPPH inhibition was used. The antioxidant activity was evaluated by free radical scavenging and by the estimation of total antioxidant activities. Flavonoid compounds were determined by means of high performance liquid chromatography with a microcolumn chromatograph Milichrom A-02 (EkoNova, Russia), followed by computer processing of the results using the MultiKhrom software for Windows. Antioxidants were extracted from leaves and berries of 6 populations of Lonicera edulis Turcz and L. altaica, as well as 9 varieties of Lonicera of various origins growing in the collections of the Yakut Botanical Garden (YBS). Results of biochemical investigation showed that the content of dry susbtances in the berries varies from 10,7 to 13.4%, with 11,4 % on average; the sum of saccharides is 8,1 %, varying within the range from 6,0 (Lonicera altaica) to 13,2 (Lonicera edulis, Gorniy District, May). Total sugar content was found maximum in berries Lonicera edulis (13,2 mg/g) and minimum in L. altaica (6.0 mg/g). The content of soluble and easily hydrolyzable carbohydrates in Lonicera ranged from 5,3 to 15 mg/g of the raw mass. The content of ascorbic acid in wildgrowing Lonicera berries (51,7 – 71,2 mg %) was higher than in the varieties (31,7 – 65,5 mg %). Biochemical analysis of the berries revealed 2 of 8 detectable components - luteolin glycoside and rutin. The highest content of detected flavonoids was revealed in samples of freshly picked ripe berries of L. altaica (luteolin glycoside 51.3 ± 2.6 µg/g of raw tissue, rutin 96.3 ± 4.8 µg/g of raw tissue). The accumulation of flavonoids in cultivars varied from year to year. Comparison of Lonicera berries TOA in respect of ripeness showed that it was higher in ripe fruits (up to 50 %). Accumulation of flavonoids in the varieties changes from one year to another. A comparison of the antioxidant activity (AOA) of the berries of different maturity showed that AOA is higher in mature berries (up to 50 %). The results show that Lonicera is a potential source of both lyophilic and lipophilic antioxidants.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. S. KorobkovaRussian Federation
KOROBKOVA Tatyana Sergeevna, candidate of biological sciences, leading researcher
41 Lenina pr., Yakutsk 677980
Researcher ID J-7915-2018
S. M. Sabaraikina
Russian Federation
SABARAIKINA Svetlana Michailovna, candidate of biological sciences, senior researcher
41 Lenina pr., Yakutsk 677980
References
1. Hasanov V.V., Ryzhova G.A., Mal’ceva E.R. Metody issledovaniya antioksidantov // Himiya rastitel’nogo syr’ya. 2004. No. 3. P. 18–22.
2. Gutteridge V., Westekmarck T., Halliwell B. Oxygen dannage in biological systems / Free radical, Aging and Degenerative Disease. – Ed. By Yohson Y. New York, 1986. 142 p.
3. Mullen W., Marks S.C., Crozier A. Evalution of phenolic compounds in commercial fruit juices and fruit drinks // Agric and Food Chem. 2007. Vol. 5, No. 8. Р. 3148–3157. DOI: 10.1021/jf062970x.
4. Volkov V.A. Fiziko-himicheskie zakonomernosti vzaimodejstviya 2,2-difenil-1-pikrilgidrazila s antioksidantami rastitel’nogo proiskhozhdeniya: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. chim. nauk. Tver’, 2010. 20 p.
5. Zyuzina A.V. Razrabotka i ocenka potrebitel’skih svojstv sokov s povyshennym antioksidantnym dejstviem: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. tekhn. nauk. Orel, 2012. 21 p.
6. Bazarnova Yu.G. Issledovanie antiokislitel’nyh svojstv ekstraktov fenol’nyh soedinenij nekotoryh rastenij: «Resursosberegayushchie tekhnologii pishchevyh proizvodstv». SPb.: SPbGAHTP, 1998. P. 193.
7. The Flavonoid / Eds J.B. Harborne, T.J. Mabry, H. Mabry. Lond., 1981. 1204 p.
8. Pleshkov B.P. Praktikum po biohimii rastenij. M.: Kolos, 1985. 254 p.
9. Elsakova S.D. Perspektivy vyrashchivaniya zhimolosti v Zapolyar’e // Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya redkih sadovyh kul’tur v SSSR: sb. nauch. tr. / VNII sadovodstva im. I.V. Michurina. Michurinsk, 1989. P. 48–50.
10. Skvorcov A.K. Golubye zhimolosti: Botanicheskoe izuchenie i perspektivy kul’tury v srednej polose Rossii. M.: Nauka, 2002. 159 p.
11. Zhidyohina T.V. Introdukciya i selekciya zhimolosti v CChR // Trudy Vserossijskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta sadovodstva: Sb. nauch. trudov. Voronezh: Kvarta, 2005. P. 415–437.
12. Shvirst E.P. Osobennosti selekcii zhimolosti sinej v usloviyah Krajnego Severa Dal’nego Vostoka // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2017. Vol. 51. P. 47–51.
13. Sorokopudov V.N., Kuklina A.G. Hozyajstvennobiologicheskaya harakteristika dekorativnyh sortov i form zhimolosti (Lonicera L.) v Rossii // Ekosistemy. 2017. No. 6 (36). P. 100–106.
14. Kozak N.V., Imamkulova Z.A., Kulikov I.M., Medvedev S.M. Istochniki hozyajstvenno-cennyh priznakov kollekcionnyh obrazcov zhimolosti sinej (Lonicera caerulea L.)// Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo. 2018. No. 1. P. 16–23.
15. Plekhanova M.N. Aktinidiya, limonnik, zhimolost’. Leningrad: Agrompromizdat, 1990. 87 p.
16. Lukisha V.V. Zhimolost’. M.: Lesnaya Promyshlennost’, 1990. 64 p.
17. Makarova N.V., Musifullina E.V., Dmitrieva A.N., Sobolev G.I. Kontrol’ issledovaniya himicheskogo sostava razlichnyh sortov zhimolosti // Izv. vuzov. Prikladnaya himiya i biotekhnologiya. 2012. No. 2(3). P. 171–172.
18. Chulkov A.N., Makarevich S.L., Dejneka V.I., Sorokopudov V.N., Dejneka L.A., Sazonova S.A. Zhimolost’ golubaya – sopostavlenie nekotoryh svojstv plodov, vyrashchennyh v Belgorode i v Moskve // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. S. Estestvennye nauki. 2011. No. 9 (104). Vol. 15/2. P. 233–237.
19. Bocharova T.E., Trunov Yu.V. Biohimicheskij sostav plodov zhimolosti v usloviyah Tambovskoj oblasti // Universitet im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Vol. 2, No. 4(10). 2007. P. 56–60.
20. Kil’diyarova P.P. Biohimicheskij sostav plodov zhimolosti sinep-lodnoj na yuzhnyh chernozyomah Orenburgskoj oblasti // Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii: sb. nauch. rabot / VSTISP. M., 2002. Vol. 9. P. 163–168.
21. Obrazcova P.A., Shmeleva I.Yu., Rozhnov E.D. Perspektivy ispol’zovaniya plodov zhimolosti v proizvodstve vinnyh napitkov // Lomonosovskie chteniya na Altae: fundamental’nye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2017. P. 1054–1055. DOI: 10.25712/ASTU.2072-8921.2020.01.003.
22. Boyarskih I.G., Yushkova Yu.V., Chernyak E.I., Morozov S.V. Soderzhanie biologicheski aktivnyh fenol’nyh soedinenij v plodah Lonicera caerulea L. Razlichnogo proiskhozhdeniya v usloviyah lesostepi Priob’ya // Vestnik Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2011. No. 3(77). P. 39–46.
23. Sayakova G.M., Izatova A.E., Tokusheva D.S. Razrabotka lechebnogo spreya iz gustogo ekstrakta zhimolosti tatarskoj i zhimolosti Pallasa dlya lecheniya ekzemy // Innovacii v zdorov’e nacii. Sbornik materialov III Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. 2015. P. 385–388.
24. Sayakova G.M., Drozdova I.V. Kolichestvennyj analiz flavonoidov v nadzemnoj chasti zhimolosti ilijskoj i zhimolosti altajskoj // Sovremennaya medicina: Aktual’nye voprosy. 2014. No. 28. P. 98–107.
25. Sorokopud A.F., Igushov N.V. Osobennosti pererabotki zamorozhennyh plodov zhimolosti v apparate s vibracionnoj tarelkoj // Vestnik Mezhdunarodnoj akademii holoda. 2017. No. 3. P. 3–9. DOI: 10.21047/1606-4313-2017-16-3-3-9.
26. Konspekt flory Yakutii: Sosudistye rasteniya / sost. L.V. Kuznecova, V.I. Zaharova. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2012. 272 p.
27. Sanches M., Larrauri C., Saura A., Calixto F. A procedure to measure the antioxidant efficiency of polyphenols // J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998. Vol. 76. P. 270–276.
28. Programma i metodika sortoizucheniya plodovyh, yagodnyh i orekhoplodnyh kul’tur. Orel, 1999. 119 p.
29. Burova T.E. Vliyanie obrabotki na sostav i svojstva rastitel’nogo syr’ya: Ucheb.-metod. posobie / Pod red. A.L. Ishevskogo. SPb.: NIU ITMO; IHiBT, 2014. 85 p.
30. Belikov V.V. Metody analiza flavonoidnyh soedinenij // Farmaciya. 1970. No. 1. P. 68.
31. Refraktometricheskij metod opredeleniya rastvorimyh suhih veshchestv // Produkty pererabotki plodov i ovoshchej. Metody analiza: GOST 28562-90. M.: IPK Izdatel’stvo standartov, 2002.
32. Korenman I.M. Metody opredeleniya organicheskih soedinenij. M.: Himiya, 1970. 343 p.
33. Murav’eva D.A. Farmakognoziya. M: Medicina, 1991. 465 p.
34. Polyudek-Fabini R., Bejrih T. Organicheskij analiz. L.: Himiya, 1981. 624 p.
35. Kuliev V.B. Antioksidantnaya aktivnost ekstraktov iz plodov Crataegus Meyeri _Rosaceae // Rastitelnie Resursi. 2013. Iss. 1. P. 279–286.
36. Krisova A.Ya., Shelkovskaya N.K. Ocenka sortoobrazcov jimolosti po biohimicheskomu sostavu plodov i listev // Vestnik Altaiskoi nauki. 2015. No. 1. P. 412–414.
Review
For citations:
Korobkova T.S., Sabaraikina S.M. Antioxidant activity of the berries of Lonicera L. under the conditions of Central Yakutia. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2020;25(4):92-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2020-25-4-7