The impact of the railway on the movement of wild ungulates in Central Yakutia

The construction of linear structures significantly impacts the livelihoods of wild ungulates in Yakutia, disrupting the integrity of the natural environment by fragmenting forest areas and reducing the extent of forest biocenoses and wildlife habitats. Between 2015 and 2022, studies were conducted to assess the impact of the Berkakit–Tommot–Nizhny Bestyakh railway on the movements of wild ungulates in Central Yakutia. During the winter months (November to January), seven trails, totaling 280 km, were surveyed along a 40 km section of the railway. A total of 115 tracks from four species of wild ungulates—Siberian roe deer, wild reindeer, red deer, and elk—were recorded over various years. We observed that the negative impact of the engineering structure on the movements of wild ungulates was primarily evident during the initial phase of its construction. During the early stages of railway construction, the high level of disturbance and the introduction of an unfamiliar artificial structure disrupted the natural movement patterns of wild ungulates. However, these patterns were restored following the completion of the railway. Wild ungulates exhibited varying responses to the unfamiliar artificial structure: wild reindeer began to cross the railway in the first year after its construction, while roe deer and red deer did so within one year, and elk took six years to adapt. The natural movement routes of wild ungulates were reestablished four to five years after the railway was completed. The succession of vegetation in the altered forest landscapes along the railway enhanced the forage base for roe deer, red deer, and elk, as abundant grass and shrub cover emerged, leading to the development of new alternative habitats in the previously disturbed areas. Therefore, the Berkakit-Tommot-Nizhny Bestyakh railway, at its current level of operational intensity, does not pose a significant threat to the movement paths of wild ungulates.

1. Safronov V.M. Ecology and use of wild reindeer in Yakutia. Yakutsk: Publishing House of the SB RAS; 2005. 178 p. (In Russ.)

2. Mamontov V.N., Efimov V.A. Ecological and ethological specifics of the isolated groups of the northern forest reideer in Archangel region. The Herald of Game Management. 2011;8(2):139–147. (In Russ.)

3. Baskin L.M., Okhlopkov I.M. Protection of large mammals from industrial threats. Moscow: KMK; 2012. 201 p. (In Russ.)

4. Stepanova V.V., Okhlopkov I.M., Argunov A.V., Solomonov N.G. Linear structures as the most important factor of habitat fragmentation of wild ungulates. Nauka i obrazovanie. 2014;76(4):83–88. (In Russ.)

5. Panchenko D.V., Tirronen K.F., Danilov P.I., et al. Assessment of the forest reindeer (Rangifer taranus fennicus Lönnb.) number and distribution in the Republic of Karelia. The Herald of Game Management. 2017;14(3): 156–165. (In Russ.)

6. Panchenko D.V, Mizin I.A, Rozhnov V.V. Northern reindeer Rangifer tarandus Linnaeus, 1758. In: Red Book of the Russian Federation. Moscow: FSBI Research Institute of Ecology; 2021. P. 1020–1025. (In Russ.)

7. Wattles D.W., Zeller K.A., DeStefano S. Response of moose to a high-density road network. Journal of Wildlife Management. 2018;82(5):929–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21459

8. Hamr J., Lieske D.J., Martin M., et al. The efficacy of highway wildlife collision mitigation in preventing elk mortality in central Ontario. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2022;86(3):e22184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22184

9. Piminov V.N., Sinitsyn A.A., Shevnina M.S., et al. Impact of linear objects on hunting animals in YamaloNenets AO. In: Titok V.V., et al. (eds.) Problems of biodiversity conservation and use of biological resources: proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 110th anniversary of the birth of Academician N.V. Smolsky, October 7–9, 2015, Minsk, Belarus. In 2 parts. P. 2. Minsk: Confido, 2015, pp. 235–238. (In Russ.)

10. Solodovnikov A.Yu., Semenova Z.A., Chistobaev A.I. Influence of oil and gas facilities of Western Siberia on the fauna. Geography and Natural Resources. 2016;(4): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.21782/GIPR0206-1619-2016- 4(48-54) (In Russ.)

11. Kolpashchikov L.A., Mikhailov V.V. Anthropogenic and natural factors of modern transformation of vegetation of reindeer pastures of the Taymyr Peninsula. In: Climatic changes and seasonal dynamics of landscapes: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Yekaterinburg, 2021, pp. 335–344. (In Russ.)

12. Kolpashchikov L.A. Threats to wild reindeer of the Taimyr population and proposals for the protection and rational use of its resources. In: Protection and rational use of animal and plant resources: Proceedings of the national conference with international participation in the framework of the 11th international scientific-practical conference. Molodezhny: A.A. Yezhevsky Irkutsk State Agrarian University; 2022, pp. 190–198. (In Russ.)

13. Stepanova V.V., Okhlopkov I.M., Krivoshapkin A.A. Possible fragmentation of the wild ungulate habitat as a result of the construction of the railroad in Central Yakutia. Nauka i obrazovanie. 2013;71(3):134–138. (In Russ.)

14. Argunov A.V., Stepanova V.V., Kirillin R.A., Okhlopkov I.M. Timing of lithophagy activity of wild ungulates in Central Yakutia. In: Theriofauna of Russia and adjacent territories: Proceedings of the International meeting (10th Congress of the Teriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences). Moscow: KMK; 2016. P. 24. (In Russ.)

15. Stepanova V.V., Argunov A.V., Kirillin R.A., Okhlopkov I.M. Time-study of moose (Alces alces L., 1758) geophagia activity in the Central Yakutia. Russian Journal of Theriology. 2017;16(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusjtheriol.16.2.07

16. Stepanova V.V., Argunov A.V., Okhlopkov I.M. Comparative characteristics of geophagia activity of red deer (Cervus elaphus L., 1758, cervidae, artiodactyla) of Yaku tia in native and invasive parts of the range. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. 2019;12(1):95–109. (In Russ.)

17. Shishikin A.S., Timoshkin V.B., Gurov A.V., et al. Animal populations on the glades of electric power line500 kw in fir and pine formations of the southern taiga. Siberian Forest Journal. 2016;(2):59–70. https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20160206 (In Russ.)

18. Argunov A.V., Krivoshapkin A.A., Boeskorov G.G. Roe deer of Central Yakutia. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of SB RAS; 2015. 123 p. (In Russ.)

19. Velichenko V.V., Sidorov M.M., Danilov V.A. On the methods of assessment of linear facility impact on game resources. Regional Environmental Issues. 2014;(1):60– 63. (In Russ.)

20. Vol’pert Ya.L., Shadrina E.G. Transformation of mammal population under the anthropogenic transformation of Arctic and Subarctic natural landscapes. Izvestiya R AN. Seriya biologicheskaya = Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Biological Series. 2020;(2):213– 223. (In Russ.)

21. Laurian C., Dussault C., Ouellet J.P., et al. Behavior of Moose Relative to a Road Network. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2008;72(7):1550–1557. https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-063

22. Bowman J., Ray J. C., Magoun A. J., et al. Roads, logging, and the large-mammal community of an eastern Canadian boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2010;88(5):454–467. https://doi.org/10.1139/З10-019

23. Rea R.V., Child K.N., Spata D.P., MacDonald D. Road and rail side vegetation management implications of habitat use by moose relative to brush cutting season. Environmental Management. 2010;46(1):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9502-6

24. Argunov A.V., Safronov V.M. New data on the distribution of musk deer (Moschus moschiferus) in Yakutia. Izvestiya RAN. Seriya biologicheskaya = Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Biological Series. 2022;(5):549–554. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026347022050031

25. Stepanova V.V., Krivoshapkin A.A. Materials on the biology of wild ungulates of Yakutia. Izubr (Cervus elaphus L.), musk deer (Moschus moschiferus L.). Nauka i obrazovanie. Yakutsk. 2001;21(1):130–133. (In Russ.)