Preview

Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources

Advanced search

Dynamics of floodplain vegetation under oil pollution in the Arctic zone

https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2024-29-4-574-588

Abstract

The significance of this research arises from the limited understanding of how floodplain plant communities in the Arctic region change in response to oil pollution. The objective of the study was to determine the trends in vegetation changes in areas affected by an accidental diesel fuel spill. The research focused on the floodplain plant communities of the Nadyezhdinsky Creek, as well as the Daldykan, Ambarnaya, and Pyasina rivers, examining both unpolluted (7 locations) and polluted areas (8 locations). The selection of study sites and the subsequent analyses were conducted using widely accepted geobotanical methods. A comparative analytical assessment of phytocenoses was performed through vegetation monitoring conducted from 2020 to 2022. The primary dynamic processes observed were linked to the emergence and extinction of species, with 53 species recorded in 2020, and 55 species from 17 families noted in both 2021 and 2022. Additionally, alterations in projective cover and shifts in the taxonomic ratios were documented. These changes were reflected in the abundance and diversity of species across various ecological groups. The cool and humid conditions experienced during the 2021 growing season promoted the proliferation of species typically associated with well-watered environments, including Equisetum arvense L. subsp. arvense, Equisetum fluviatile L., Eriophorum scheuchzeri Hoppe, and Carex aquatilis Wahlenb. s. str. In contrast, the warm and dry conditions in 2022 adversely affected these species, leading to their disappearance or a reduction in their projective cover. The predominant changes in vegetation dynamics from 2021 to 2022 can be characterized as fluctuations, regardless of the ecological context of the study sites, with no significant alterations in species composition or shifts in dominant species. Overall, there were no indications of catastrophic effects resulting from oil pollution. The observed changes in the plant communities were localized and primarily attributed to variations in climatic conditions and the specific hydrological characteristics of the individual water bodies.

About the Authors

T. A. Turchina
Research Institute of Agriculture and Ecology of the Arctic – Branch of the Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center”
Russian Federation

Turchina Tatiana Anatol′evna, Dr. Sci. (Agr.), Senior Researcher, Chief Researcher

ResearcherID: AAT-8537-2020, Scopus Author ID: 57039211000

Norilsk



Z. A. Yanchenko
Research Institute of Agriculture and Ecology of the Arctic – Branch of the Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center”
Russian Federation

Yanchenko Zoya Anatol′evna, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Director

Norilsk



References

1. Mirkin B.M. Patterns of development of vegetation of river floodplains. Moscow: Nauka; 1974. 174 p. (In Russ.)

2. Nikonova A.N. Transformation of floodplain ecosystems of the Pechora delta in the zone of influence of the Kumzhinskoye gas condensate field (Nenets Autonomous Okrug). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2015;5:117–129. (In Russ.)

3. Ecosystems of rivers’ floodplains: structure, dynamics, resources potential. Ed. by Zaletaeva V.S. Moscow: RASHN Publ.; 1997. 596 p. (In. Russ.)

4. Kretz L., Bondar-Kunze E., Hein T., et al. Vegetation characteristics control local sediment and nutrient retention on but not underneath vegetation in floodplain meadows. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252694

5. Sandi S.G., Saco P.M., Kuczera G., et al. Predicting floodplain inundation and vegetation dynamics in arid wetlands. E3S Web of Conferences. 2018;40:02019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184002019RiverFlow2018.

6. Bijlmakers J., Griffioen J., Karssenberg D. Environmental drivers of spatio-temporal dynamics in floodplain vegetation: grasslands as habitat for megafauna in Bardia National Park (Nepal). Biogeosciences. 2023; 20:1113–1144. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1113-2023.

7. Yurkevich N.V., Eltsov I.N., Gureev V.N., et al. Technogenic effect on the environment in the Russian Arctic by the Example of the Norilsk industrial area. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Аssets Engineering. 2021;332(12):230–249. (In. Russ.)

8. Loiko S., Klimova N., Kuzmina D., Pokrovsky O. Lake drainage in permafrost regions produces variable plant communities of high biomass and productivity. Plants. 2020;9(7):1–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9070867.

9. Pokrovsky O.S., Manasypov R.M., Kopysov S.G., et al. Impact of permafrost thaw and climate warming on riverine export fluxes of carbon, nutrients and metals in Western Siberia. Water (Switzerland). 2020;12(6):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061817.

10. Bazilevich N.I. Biological productivity of ecosystems of Northern Eurasia. Moscow: Nauka; 1993. 293 p. (In. Russ.)

11. Liningera K.B., Wohl E. Floodplain dynamics in North American permafrost regions under a warming climate and implications for organic carbon stocks: A review and synthesis. EarthScience Reviews. 2019;193:24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.024.

12. Declaration on the protection of the arctic environment.Rovaniemi, Finland/June 14, 1991.Available at: http://library.arcticportal.org/1542/1/artic_environment.pdf.

13. Lifshits S., Glyaznetsova Yu., Erofeevskaya L., et al. Effect of oil pollution on the ecological condition of soils and bottom sediments of the arctic region (Yakutia). Environmental Pollution. 2021;288:117680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117680.

14. Glyaznetsova Yu.S., Nemirovskaya I.A. Accidental diesel fuel spill in Norilsk. Priroda. 2022;1279(3):27–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0032874X22030036.

15. Zakharov A.I., Zakharova L.N., Mitnik L.M. Monitoring the stability of fuel tanks at Norilsk CHPP-3 using radar interferometry methods. Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from space. 2020;17(5):281–285. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2020-17-5-281-285.

16. Sazonov A.D., Komarov R.S., Peredera O.S. Oil product spill in Norilsk May 29, 2020: alleged reasons and possible environmental. Ecology. Economy. Computer science. Series: System Analysis and Modeling of Economic and Ecological Systems. 2020;1(5):173–177. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23885/2500-395X-2020-1-5-173-177.

17. Troshko K.A., Denisov P.V., Lavrova O.Yu., et al. Observation of the Ambarnaya River pollution resulting from the accident at the Norilsk Thermal Power Plant No. 3 on May 29, 2020. Modern problems of remote sensing of the Earth from space. 2020;17(3):267–274. (In Russ.)

18. Yakutseny S.P., Solovyov I.A. Calculation of environmental damage as a result of an accident at a fuel depot in Norilsk. Geographical Environment and Living Systems. 2020;4:48–56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18384/2712-7621-2020-4-48-56.

19. Zhulidov A.V., Robarts R.D., Pavlov D.F., et al. Long-term changes of heavy metal and sulphur concentrations in ecosystems of the Taymyr Peninsula (Russian Federation) North of the Norilsk Industrial Complex. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2011;181(1–4): 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1848-y

20. Jonathan P.R., Lehmann L., Hession W.C. Quantifying the spatial variability of annual and seasonal changes in riverscape vegetation using drone laser scanning. Drones. 2021;5(3):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030091.

21. Ramensky L.G. Problems and methods of studying the vegetation cover: Selected works. Leningrad: Nauka; 1971. 334 p. (In Russ.)

22. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie, Grudzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd ed. Wien–New York: Springer; 1964. 865 p.

23. Kucherov I.B., Payanskaya I.I. Methods for describing the state of vegetation. In: Anthropogenic dynamics of the vegetation cover of the Arctic and Subarctic: principles and methods of study. St. Petersburg; 1995, pp. 51– 63. (In Russ.)

24. Flora of Siberia / Comp. THEM. Krasnoborov, M.N. Lomonosov, N.N. Tupitsina, et al. In 14 volumes. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1997. (In. Russ.)

25. Secretareva N.A. Vascular plants of the Russian Arctic and adjacent territories. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd.; 2004. 131 p. (In Russ.)

26. Mironycheva-Tokareva N.P., Mikhailova E.V., Lada N.Yu. Plant successions and dynamics of plant material in the meadows of the Central Tuva Basin affected by underflooding. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series Biologiya. Ecologiya. 2014;10:64–72. (In. Russ.)

27. Rebristaya O.V., Khitun O.V. Features of the methodology for studying vegetation changes during linear disturbances and the construction of linear structures / Methods for identifying and studying the rows of digressive and restorative vegetation changes under the influence of disturbances. In: Anthropogenic dynamics of the vegetation cover of the Arctic and Subarctic: principles and methods of study. Proceedings of the Komarov Botanical Institute RAS. St. Petersburg; 1995, pp. 91–96. (In Russ.)

28. Maximum permissible concentrations (MPC) of chemicals in soil. Hygienic standards GN 2.1.7.2041–06. Moscow: Federal Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor; 2006. 15 p. (In Russ.)

29. Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation dated January 28, 2021 No. 2 “On approval of sanitary rules and norms SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 “Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness of environmental factors to humans.” Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202102030022 (In Russ.)

30. Drugov Yu.S., Rodin A.A. Contaminated Soil and Hazardous Waste Analysis: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed., revised. and additional. Moscow: BINOM; 2011. 469 p. (In Russ.)

31. Resolution Government of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated December 17, 2021 No. 902-p “On approval of regional standards for the permissible residual content of oil and its transformation products in soils after reclamation and other restoration work on land plots susceptible to contamination as a result of an emergency spill of oil and oil products in the territory of the Taimyr DolganoNenets municipal district and the city of Norilsk”. Available at: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/2400202112220013 (In Russ.)

32. PND F 16.1:2.21-98. Methodology for measuring the mass fraction of petroleum products in soil samples using the fluorimetric method using the “FLUORAT-02” liquid analyzer. Available at: https://ohranatruda.ru/upload/iblock/2ca/4293799929.pdf (In Russ.)

33. Bykova M.V. The problem of rationing in assessing the level of soil pollution with oil products. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 2019; 11 (6). Available at:https://esj.today/PDF/83NZVN619.pdf (In Russ.)

34. Weather schedule [rp5.ru]; 2023 [updated 01 July 2023; cited 20 July 2023]. Available at: https://rp5.ru/Архив_погоды_в_Норильске. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Turchina T.A., Yanchenko Z.A. Dynamics of floodplain vegetation under oil pollution in the Arctic zone. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2024;29(4):574-588. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2024-29-4-574-588

Views: 93


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-9712 (Print)
ISSN 2686-9683 (Online)