Small shelly fossils from the Kharayutekh Formation of the Upper Vendian period in the lower reaches of the Lena River in Eastern Siberia
https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2024-29-4-527-534
Abstract
The study of problematic skeletal remains from the Kharayutekh Formation of the Upper Vendian period, uncovered along the right bank of the Lena River at the mouth of the Ulakhan-Ald’yarkhay Brook, revealed two distinct levels characterized by finds of small shelly fossils embedded in dark gray limestones. The first assemblage includes problematic skeletal remains with indeterminate systematic affinities, as well as two morphological types of fossil specimens attributed to the genus Tianzhushania. These specimens represent different stages in the embryonic development of this taxonomic group. In addition to Tianzhushania, the second, younger level also contains chancellorids (Chancelloria sp.) and hyoliths (Paragloborilus subglobosus). The material for this study consisted of a collection of several dozen fossilized specimens, obtained through the standard process of chemical preparation, which involved dissolving limestone in a weak acetic acid solution (3–5 %). Based on the findings, it can be inferred that the Tuorasis Basin of the passive continental margin of Siberia during the Late Vendian period provided favorable conditions for the survival and evolution of the microflora discussed in this paper. These discoveries are of significant interest from both paleobiological and stratigraphical perspectives. In the future, it will be crucial to conduct more in-depth research on the morphological features and internal structures of the embryonic fossils found in the Kharayutekh Formation of the Ulakhan-Ald’yarkhay section, employing a microtomographic approach to validate their embryonic nature. Additionally, further sampling of small shelly fossils from the Kharayutekh Formation is essential to enhance the faunal attributes and strengthen the biostratigraphical foundation.
Supporting agencies: This study was conducted within the framework of the state assignment for the Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics SB RAS (No. FWZZ-2022-0003).
About the Author
N. V. Novozhilova
Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Novozhilova Natalya Valentinovna, Cand. Sci. (Geol. and Mineral.), Senior Researcher, Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics; Associate Professor, Geology and Geophysics Department
ResearcherID: T-4479-2017, Scopus Author ID: 25228056300
Novosibirsk
References
1. Bengtson S., Yue Z. Fossilized metazoan embryos from the earliest Cambrian. Science. 1997;277:1645–1648.
2. Kouchinsky A., Bengtson S., Gershwin L. Cnidarian-like embryos associated with the first shelly fossils in Siberia. Geology. 1999;27:609–612.
3. Dong X., Donoghue P.C.J., Cunningham J., et al. The anatomy, affinity and phylogenetic significance of Markuelia. Evolution and Development. 2005;7(5): 468–482.
4. Landon E.N.U., Liu P.J., Yin Z.J., et al. Cellular preservation of excysting developmental stages of new eukaryotes from the early Ediacaran Weng’an Biota. Palaeoworld. 2019;28:461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.05.005
5. Hagadorn J.W., Xiao S., Donoghue P.C.J., et al. Cellular and subcellular structure of Neoproterozoic animal embryos. Science. 2006;314:291–294.
6. Chen J., Oliveri P., Li C.-W., et al. Precambrian animal diversity: putative phosphatised embryos from the Doushantuo Formation of China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(9):4457–4462.
7. Chen J.-Y., Schopf J.W., Bottjer D.J., et al. Raman spectra of a Lower Cambrian ctenophore embryo from southwestern Shaanxi, China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(15):6289–6292.
8. Chen J., Braun A., Waloszek D., et al. Lower Cambrian yolk-pyramid embryos from southern Shaanxi, China. Progress in Natural Science. 2004;14(2):167–172.
9. Donoghue P.C.J., Kouchinsky A., Waloszek D., et al. Fossilized embryos are widespread but the record is temporally and taxonomically biased. Evolution and Development. 2006;8(2):232–238.
10. Pyle L.J., Narbonne G.M., Nowlan G.S., et al. Early Cambrian metazoan eggs, embryos, and phosphatic microfossils from northwestern Canada. Journal of Paleontology. 2006;80(5):811–825.
11. Broce J., Schiffbauer J.D., Sen Sharma K., et al. Possible animal embryos from the Lower Cambrian (Stage 3) Shuijingtuo Formation, Hubei Province, South China. Journal of Paleontology. 2014;88:385–394.
12. Willman S., Peel J.S., Ineson J.R. et al. Ediacaran Doushantuo-type biota discovered in Laurentia. Communinications Biology. 2020;3(1):647. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01381-7
13. Melnikov N.V., Yakshin M.S., Shishkin B.B., et al. Stratigraphy of oil and gas basins of Siberiа. Riphean and Vendian of Siberian Platform and its plaited berder. Novosibirsk: Geo; 2005. 428 p. (In Russ.)
14. Missarzhevskiy V.V. Oldest sceletal fossils and stratigraphy of Precambrian and Cambrian boundary beds. Moscow: Nauka; 1989. 237 p. (In Russ.)
15. Novozhilova N.V. Upper Vendian embryos from Kharaulakh (Siberian platform. In: Micropaleontology: Fundamental problems and contributions to the regional geological study of the subsurface. Proceedings of the 18th All-Russian Micropaleontological Meeting, St. Petersburg, October 30 – November 3, 2023. St. Petersburg; 2023, pp. 435–437.
16. Valkov A.K. The distribution of the most ancient skeletal creatures and the relationship between the Lower Cambrian in the southeastern region of the Siberian platform. In: The Late Precambrian and Early Paleozoic of Siberia. Vendian deposits. Novosibirsk; 1983, pp. 37–48. (In Russ.)
17. Valkov A.K. Biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian in the east of the Siberian Platform: The Yudomo-Olenek Region. Moscow: Nauka; 1987. 136 p. (In Russ.)
18. Vasilieva N.I. Small shelly fossils and Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy of Siberian Platform. St. Peterburg; 1998. 139 p. (In Russ.)
19. Yin C., Bengtson S., Yue Z. Silicified and phosphatized Tianzhushania, spheroidal microfossils of possible animal origin from the Neoproterozoic of South China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2004;49(1):1–12.
20. Bailey J.V., Joye S.B., Kalanetra K.M., et al. Evidence of giant sulphur bacteria in Neoproterozoic phosphorites. Nature. 2007;445:198–201.
21. Huldtgren T., Cunningham J.A., Yin C., et al. Fossilized nuclei and germination structures identify Ediacaran “animal embryos” as encysting protists. Science. 2011;334:1696–1699.
22. Chen L., Xiao S., Pang K., et al. Cell differentiation and germ–soma separation in Ediacaran animal embryo-like fossils. Nature. 2014;516:238–241.
23. Yin Z., Zhu M., Bottjer D.J. et al. Meroblastic cleavage identifies some Ediacaran Doushantuo (China) embryo-like fossils as metazoans. Geology. 2016;44:735–738.
24. Repina L.N., Lazarenko N.P., Meshkova N.P., et al. Biostratigraphy and fauna of the Lower Cambrian Charaulach (ridge Tuora-Sis). Moscow: Nauka; 1974. 300 p. (In Russ.)
25. Rozanov A.Ju., Repina L.N., Apollonov M.K., et al. Cambrian of Siberia. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1992. 132 p. (In Russ.)
26. The resolutions of the All-Union Stratigraphic Conference on the Precambrian, Paleozoic, and Quaternary Systems in Central Siberia. Leningrad: VSEGEI; 1983. 216 p. (In Russ.)
27. Kolosov P.N. A New Finding of Beltanelliformis in Vendian of the Kharaulakh Mountains in Eastern Siberia. Nauka i obrazovanie. 2016;(3):13–16. (In Russ.)
28. Zhao G.C., Wang Y.J., Huang B.C., et al. Geological reconstructions of the East Asian blocks: from the breakup of Rodinia to the assembly of Pangea. Earth-Science Reviews. 2018;186:262–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.003
Review
For citations:
Novozhilova N.V. Small shelly fossils from the Kharayutekh Formation of the Upper Vendian period in the lower reaches of the Lena River in Eastern Siberia. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2024;29(4):527-534. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2024-29-4-527-534
Views:
119
Email this article 