Phenological response of some species of the genus Allium to climate change in Central Yakutia
https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2023-28-2-275-282
Abstract
The temperature regime showed a statistically significant positive trend in Yakutsk during the period 1961–2021. Thus, climate warming in the region has led to minor phenological shifts in the seasonal development of the Allium species, which differ in amplitude, duration, and direction. However, statistical analysis did not show significant differences in the phenological cycles of A. schoenoprasum, A. senescens, and A. ramosum. In a climate that has been changing for 54 years, these species have retained stability in the timing of their main phenological phases. The most noticeable phenological response to climate change was noted in two species – A. prostratum, A. splendens, that respond with statistically significant shifts in the beginning of flowering period (A. prostratum, р = 0,0009), the end of vegetative period (A. splendens, р = 0,0137), duration of prefloral period (A. prostratum, p = 0,0162) and duration of vegetative period (A. splendens, p = 0,0298). We conclude that a slight shift in the timing of the main phenological phases in the five species of the genus Allium over 54 years suggests the inertia of the phenological response of the plants to climate change.
Keywords
Alliaceae,
Allium,
climate change,
air temperature,
total precipitation,
long-term phenological observations,
phenological reaction,
Central Yakutia
Supporting agencies: This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant number RSF 22-24-20099.). We used archival materials from the Yakutsk Botanical Garden of the Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS.
About the Authors
N. S. DANILOVA
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone; Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
DANILOVA, Nadezhda Sofronofna, Dr. Sci (Biol.), Professor, Chief Researcher
ResearcherID: S-8136-2016, Scopus AuthorID: 144580
Yakutsk
S. Z. BORISOVA
Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
BORISOVA, Sargylana Zakharovna, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Assistant Professor
ResearcherID: A-4953-2014, Scopus AuthorID: 144581
Yakutsk
N. N. EGOROVA
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone; Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
EGOROVA, Nyurguyana Nazarovna, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Researcher
ResearcherID: ADZ-5552-2022, Scopus AuthorID: 726965
Yakutsk
D. N. ANDROSOVA
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ANDROSOVA, Darja Nikolaevna, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Researcher
ResearcherID: GZK-2378-2022, Scopus AuthorID: 785152
Yakutsk
S. N. ANDREEVA
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ANDREEVA, Sakhaya Nikolaevna, Junior Researcher
ResearcherID: GZG-8254-2022, Scopus AuthorID: 682968
Yakutsk
References
1. A report on climate features on the territory of the Russian Federation in 2021. Moscow; 2022. 104 p. (In Russ.).
2. Root T., Price J., Hall K. et al. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 2003;421: 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01333
3. Clark R.M., Thompson R. Predicting the impact of global warming on the timing of spring flowering. International Journal of Climatology. 2010;30(11):1599–1613. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2004
4. Zhmyleva A.P., Karpukhina E.A., Zhmylev P.Yu. Influence of climate warmening on flowering time of early and lately flowering forest plants. RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life safety. 2011;(2):5–15 (In Russ.).
5. Fomin E.S., Fomina T.I. Changes in the phenology of perennial plants in Western Siberia against the background of global climate warming. Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2021;28(5):543–556. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/SEJ20210504
6. Rosbakh S., Hartig F., Sandanov D.V., Bukharova E.V., Miller T.K., Primack R.B. Siberian plants shift their phenology in response to climate change. Global Change Biology. 2021;27(18):4435–4448. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/gcb.15744
7. Bertin R.I. Plant phenology and distribution in relation to recent climate change Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 2008;135(1):126–146. https://doi.org/10.3159/07-RP-035R.1
8. Sandanov D.V., Liu Y., Wang Z., Korolyuk A.Yu. Woody and herbaceous plants of Inner Asia: species richness and ecogeorgraphic patterns. Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2020;27(4):450–462. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/SEJ20200404
9. Sheftel B.I., Yakushov V.D. Influence of climate warming on terrestrial species of the middle Yenisei taiga. Contemporary Problems of Ecology. 2022;29(1):1–12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/SEJ20220101
10. Gavrilova M.K. The climate of Central Yakutia. Yakutsk; 1973. 119 p. (In Russ.)
11. Instruction to hydrometeorological stations and posts. Issue 11. Agrometeorological observations at stations and posts. Part 1, book 2. Basic agrometeorological observations. Moscow; 2000. 284 p. (In Russ.)
12. Beidemann I.N. The study of plant phenology. In: Field Geobotany. Part 2. Moscow, Leningrad; 1960:333– 366 (In Russ.)
13. England M., McGregor S., Spence P. et al. Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the ongoing warming hiatus. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4(2):222–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2106
Review
For citations:
DANILOVA N.S., BORISOVA S.Z., EGOROVA N.N., ANDROSOVA D.N., ANDREEVA S.N. Phenological response of some species of the genus Allium to climate change in Central Yakutia. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2023;28(2):275-282. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2023-28-2-275-282
Views:
170
Email this article 