Preview

Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources

Advanced search

Mineral composition, physical and mechanical properties of mammoth tusks of different grades

https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2023-28-3-495-506

Abstract

According to current regulations, mammoth tusk (MT) grades are identified based on their appearance (integrity and geometric parameters), without considering their mineralization features, mechanical properties, and humidity. However, these characteristics specify approaches for the storage and bone cutting processing of raw materials. This study aimed to investigate the features of mineralization and the relationships between the physical and mechanical properties of MT and their grades. We studied MT samples from Grades I to IV. Their mineral compositions were determined using X-ray phase analysis. The indicators of maximum moisture saturation and dynamics of the change in mass after drying were identified according to the MT grade. The dependence of the physical and mechanical properties of various grades of MT on their moisture content was established. X-ray phase analysis revealed that MT Grades III and IV differed from Grades I and II in the presence of phosphate mineral impurities. We found that the presence of cracks and pores in the studied samples significantly affected the index of maximum water saturation and nature of moisture loss. The study of the physical and mechanical properties of the MT samples showed that with an increase in moisture content, the compressive strength decreased. We also proved that the physical and mechanical properties of MT did not depend on their grades.

About the Authors

T. M. Solovev
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Solovev, Tuskul M., Сand. Sci. (Eng.), Junior Researcher

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: A-8985-2019,

RISC AuthorID: 959304



T. A. Isakova
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Isakova, Tatyana A., Researcher

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: A-9005-2019,

Scopus AuthorID: 56233152900,

RISC AuthorID: 997578



V. V. Pavlova
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Pavlova, Valeriya V., Junior Researcher

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: G-1242-2017,

Scopus AuthorID: 57207732763,

RISC AuthorID: 922259



G. V. Botvin
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Botvin, Gleb V., Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Researcher

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: A-8984-2019,

Scopus AuthorID: 57193342926,

RISC AuthorID: 1050374



A. A. Chirikov
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Chirikov, Aleksandr A., Junior Researcher

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: AAZ-8527-2020,

Scopus AuthorID: 57226573537,

RISC AuthorID: 1080866



V. V. Petrov
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Petrov, Vyacheslav V., Technologist

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: AAO-6767-2021,

RISC AuthorID: 1086389



E. S. Petukhova
Laboratory for Technologies and Processing of Raw Materials of Mammoth Fauna, Yakut Scientific Centre, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Petukhova, Evgeniia S., Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Head of the Laboratory

Yakutsk

ResearcherID: A-5453-2014,

Scopus AuthorID: 57189756749,

RISC AuthorID: 177616



References

1. Solovyev T.M., Petukhova E.S., Botvin G.V., Kolesova E.S., Petrov V.V. Influence of storage conditions on physical properties of mammoth ivories. All materials. Encyclopaedic reference manual. 2021;(11):14–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31044/1994-6260-2021-0-11-14-19.

2. Smirnov A.N. Fossil ivory: problems and perspectives of the studies and development of the resource potential in the Russian Arctic. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2005;5(13):255–257. (In Russ.)

3. Smirnov A.N. The fossil ivory resource potential in the Russian Arctic. Mineral recourses of Russia. Economics and management. 2007;(4):21–29. (In Russ.)

4. Kirillin N.D., Nogovitsin R.R. Fossil ivory is a special natural resource. Nauka i tekhnika v Yakutii. 2018; 1(18):19–23. (In Russ.)

5. Keremyasov N.V. Methods and technologies of fossil mammoth bone search. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University. Earth sciences. 2018;(2):5–18. (In Russ.)

6. Kendall C., Eriksen A.M., Kontopoulos I., Collins M.J., Turner-Walker G. Diagenesis of archaeological bone and tooth. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2018;491:21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.11.041

7. Fernandez-Jalvo Y., Sanchez-Chillon B., Andrews P., Fernandez-Lopez S., Alcala Martinez L. Morphological taphonomic transformations of fossil bones in continental environments, and repercussions on their chemical composition. Archaeometry. 2002;44(3):353–361.

8. Hedges R.E.M. Bone diagenesis: an overview of processes. Archaeometry. 2002;44(3):319–328.

9. Matthiesen H., Eriksen A.M., Hollesen J., Collins M. Bone degradation at five Arctic archaeological sites: Quantifying the importance of burial environment and bone characteristics. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2021;125:105296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105296

10. Guareschi E.E., Nicholls Ph.K., Evans N.Y., Barham M.B. et al. Bone diagenesis in the marine environment-I: Characterization and distribution of trace elements in terrestrial mammalian bones recovered from historic shipwrecks. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 2022;32(2):509–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.3072

11. Isakova T.A., Petukhova E.S., Pavlova, V.V., Erofeevskaya L.A. Features of biological contamination of mammoth tusks during long-term storage in various conditions. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2021; 26(3):75–85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2021-26-3-75-85

12. Guareschi E.E., Magni P.A., Berry H.G.G. Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology. Heritage. 2023;6(2):779–788. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6020042

13. On approval of the Concept for the development of the collection, study, use, processing and sale of paleontological materials of the mammoth fauna in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Order of the Head of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). №649-RG dt. 13.08.2018. (In Russ.)

14. Solovyev T.M., Petukhova E.S., Botvin G.V., Isakova T.A., Pavlova V.V. Analysis of composition and structure of Mammuthus primigenius mammoth tusk by thermogrammetric and x-ray spectroscopy methods. Materialovedenie. 2021;(2):9–12 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31044/1684-579X-2021-0-2-9-12

15. Freund A., Eggert G., Kutzke H., Barbier B. On the Occurrence of Magnesium Phosphates on Ivory. Studies in Conservation. 2002;(47):155–160.

16. Shen M., Lu Z., Xu Y., He X. Vivianite and its oxidation products in mammoth ivory and their implications to the burial process. ACS Omega. 2021;6(34):22284– 22291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02964

17. Blue iron earth; 2007. catalogmineralov.ru; URL: https://catalogmineralov.ru/mineral/vivianite.html (accessed: 16.03.2023)

18. Scott D. A., Eggert G. The vicissitudes of vivianite as pigment and corrosion product. Stud. Conserv. 2013;52:3−13.

19. Albéric M., Gourrier A., Wagermaier W., Fratzl P., Reiche I. The three-dimensional arrangement of the mineralized collagen fibers in elephant ivory and its relation to mechanical and optical properties. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018;72:342–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.016

20. Drozdova N.A., Nasonova V.V. Influence of different food additives and ingredients on the technological characteristics of animal proteins. Theory and practice of meat processing. 2016;1(3):48–56. (In Russ.)

21. Fadeev A.S., Yampolskaya G.P., Levachev S.M., Zaytsev S.Yu. Denaturation of collagen monolayers at the water-air interface: process modeling. Biologiceskie membrany. 2008;25(2):142–154. (In Russ.)

22. Plotnikov V.V., Protopopov A.V., Petrova T.F. Natural methods for preserving mammoth tusks (Mammuthus primigenius Blumenbach, 1799). Northern archives and expeditions. 2020;4(3):131–141. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31806/2542-1158-2020-4-3-131-140

23. Drying tusk; 2020. rezbaderevo.ru; URL: https://rezbaderevo.ru/sushka-bivnya (accessed: 16.03.2023)

24. Pfeifer S.J., Hartramph W.L., Kahlke R.-D., Muller F.A. Mammoth ivory was the most suitable osseous raw material for the production of Late Pleistocene big game projectile points. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):1–10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-38779-1

25. Vollrath F. Ivory as an Important Model Bio-composite. Curator: The Museum Journal. 2018;61(1):95–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cura.12236


Review

For citations:


Solovev T.M., Isakova T.A., Pavlova V.V., Botvin G.V., Chirikov A.A., Petrov V.V., Petukhova E.S. Mineral composition, physical and mechanical properties of mammoth tusks of different grades. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2023;28(3):495-506. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2023-28-3-495-506

Views: 242


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-9712 (Print)
ISSN 2686-9683 (Online)