About the «reliability of the material» paradigm
https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2020-25-3-15
Abstract
In 2012, materials scientists determined the feasibility of making changes and proposed a four-part formula for the materials science paradigm «composition-structure-technology-properties». At the same time, the main orientation vector is aimed at a complex approach to the study and creation of materials with a mandatory account of the influence of the technology of obtaining materials on the formation of specified properties with a specifically selected composition and structure of materials. This paper reflects the possibility of making changes to the generally accepted paradigm of materials science «composition – structure – technology – properties». It is proposed to introduce the fifth link – reliability, which determines the requirements for the properties of materials and technologies for their production, which also affects the choice of their composition and structure. In addition, reliability is one of the criteria for the quality of materials and allows you to form a unified scientific approach to its assessment. The practical example shows the functional and mathematical dependences of individual reliability indicators and their comparison with the service characteristics of high-manganese steels, as well as the applicability of the developed methodological approach to evaluate the reliability and quality of materials and technologies, taking into account the economic feasibility of using various technologies. Thus, using the proposed methodological approach to assess the reliability of parts, by the example of the manufacture of fine-ground coal bilo, it is determined that it is most profitable to use less alloyed material in the manufacture of bilo, while there is a possibility of increasing the economic effect if the possibility of working surface hardening is provided.
About the Authors
I. O. Romanov
Far Eastern State Transport University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ROMANOV Igor Olegovich, candidate, associate professor
47 Seryshev str., Khabarovsk 680021
V. M. Makienko
Far Eastern State Transport University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MAKIENKO Victor Mihailovich, doctor of technical sciences, professor
47 Seryshev str., Khabarovsk 680021
Y. A. Vostrikov
Far Eastern State Transport University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
VOSTRIKOV Yaroslav Alekseevich, senior lecturer
47 Seryshev str., Khabarovsk 680021
References
1. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyucij. M.: Progress, 1977. 300 p.
2. Grigor’ev S.N. Tekhnologicheskie principy osazhdeniya iznosostojkih nanopokrytij dlya primeneniya v instrumental’nom proizvodstve // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol’skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Nauki o prirode i tekhnike. 2011. No. I-1(1). P. 92–98.
3. Murav’ev V.I., Evstigneev A.I., Bahmatov P.V., Butin A.V. Analiticheskaya ocenka i razrabotka metodov povysheniya korrozionnoj stojkosti konstrukcionnyh stalej TSPN // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol’skogo-naAmure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Nauki o prirode i tekhnike. 2011. No. IV-1(8). P. 92–98.
4. Verhoturov A.D. Grigorij Valentinovich Samsonov – osnovatel’ novoj paradigmy v materialovedenii // G.V. Samsonov – uchenyj, uchitel’, drug. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 2012. P. 53–63.
5. Verhoturov A.D., Mokrickij B.Ya., Pustovalov D.A. et al. K voprosu o novoj paradigme materialovedeniya // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol’skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Nauki o prirode i tekhnike. 2014. No. III-1(19). P. 92–98.
6. Kozlov S.I. Sovershenstvovanie remontov kak uslovie promyshlennoj bezopasnosti metallurgicheskih predpriyatij // Mekhanicheskoe oborudovanie metallurgicheskih zavodov. 2015. No. 2 (5). P. 69–74.
7. Milojević I.S., Rade V. Guberinić stochastic model of forecasting spare parts demand // Vojnotehnički Glasnik. 2012. Vol. 60(1). P. 216–234. DOI 10.5937/vojtehg1201216M.
8. Fragassa C., Pavlovic A., Massimo S. Using a total quality strategy in a new practical approach for improving the product reliability in automotive industry // International Journal for Quality Research. 2014. Vol. 8(3). P. 297–310.
9. Stere A. Dependability and reliability of manufacturing systems // Fiabilitate şi Durabilitate. 2014. No. 1. Suppl. 1. P. 99–105.
10. Kosimov K., Mamadzhanov P., Mahmudov R. Kompozicionnye poroshkovye materialy dlya uprochneniya poverhnostej detalej mashin // Rossijskij elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2014. No. 1. P. 29–35.
11. Bajgil’din D.Yu. Obzor sushchestvuyushchih sovremennyh materialov dlya vos-stanovleniya detalej mashin // Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. 2014. No. 5-1. P. 16–18.
12. Medneva A.V., Ri E.H., Hosen R. et al. Elektrodnye materialy iz alyuminidov nikelya dlya elektroiskrovoj obrabotki // Uchenye zametki TOGU. Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie. 2016. Vol. 7, No. 4. P. 321–324.
13. Babenko E.G. Teoreticheskie i tekhnologicheskie osnovy povysheniya kachestva i svojstv splavov (pokrytij) pri elektrotermicheskih processah na baze sozdaniya legiruyushchih svarochno-naplavochnyh materialov s is-pol’zovaniem mineral’nogo syr’ya: Diss. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni dokt. tekhn. nauk. Komsomol’skna-Amure, 2002.
14. Himuhin S.N., Verhoturov A.D. Elektrodnyj material iz belyh chugunov, legirovannyh vol’framom // Perspektivnye materialy. 2006. No. 5. P. 49–53.
15. Protasov V.N. Metodologiya vybora materialov potrebitel’skogo kachestva dlya mashinostroitel’noj produkcii // Territoriya Neftegaz. 2011. No. 4. P. 24–29.
16. Stopalov S. Nadezhnost’ traktorov. Dolgovechnost’ i bezotkaznost’ – chto vazhnee? // Sel’skohozyajstvennaya tekhnika: obsluzhivanie i remont. 2011. No. 7. P. 24–28.
17. Bondareva G.I. Povyshenie nadezhnosti mashin putem razrabotki i optimizacii sposobov vosstanovleniya rabotosposobnosti mashin i oborudovaniya // Mezhdunarodnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2010. No. 5. P. 85–92.
18. Pronikov A.S. Nadezhnost’ mashin. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1978. 592 p.
19. Kugel’ R.V. O naturnyh ispytaniyah dolgovechnosti detalej i agregatov mashin. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1970. 237 p.
20. Reshetov D.N. Nadezhnost’ i dolgovechnost’ mashin. Ucheb. posobie dlya mashinostr. spec. vuzov. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1988. 240 p.
21. Kugel’ R.V. Dolgovechnost’ avtomobilej / pod red. d.t.n. prof. A.A. Lipgarta. M.: GNTI Mashinostroitel’noj lit-ry. 1961. 432 p.
22. Strel’cov A.S., Romanov I.O. Sistema ocenok pokazatelej nadezhnosti mashin i diagnostiki ekonomicheskoj celesoobraznosti vosstanovleniya i uprochneniya detalej mashiny // Svarka i Diagnostika. 2016. No. 5 (59). P. 30–35.
23. Romanov I.O., Strel’cov A.S. Funkcional’no matematicheskoe opredelenie pokazatelej nadezhnosti i ustanovlenie zavisimosti kompleksnogo pokazatelya ot edinichnyh na stadiyah izgotovleniya i vosstanovleniya detalej, opredelyayushchih bezotkaznost’mashiny // Nadezhnost’. 2018. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 10–16.
24. Makaev E.A. Obshchaya teoriya sravnitel’nogo yazykoznaniya. M.: Nauka, 1977. 205 p.
25. Uemov A.I. Sistemnyj podhod i obshchaya teoriya sistem. M.: Mysl’, 1978. 272 p.
Review
For citations:
Romanov I.O., Makienko V.M., Vostrikov Y.A. About the «reliability of the material» paradigm. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2020;25(3):152-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2020-25-3-15
Views:
105
Email this article 