The use of the magnetic susceptibility index of soils for the assessment of the ecological state of the soils in Yakutsk
https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2021-26-1-8
Abstract
For the first time, the volume magnetic susceptibility (VMS) was determined for technogenically polluted soils of Yakutsk formed on permafrost and functioning in the cryoarid climate of Central Yakutia. Magnetometric survey was carried out over the territory of the modern city of Yakutsk using an arbitrary observation network, and 444 measurements of soil VMS were made using a small-sized KM-7 kappameter. The values of soil VMS in Yakutsk vary significantly, with the average value equal to 163,5·10–5 Si units. This parameter varies within the range 13,2-1220,0·10–5 Si units, that is, almost three orders of magnitude (103 ), which points to its high variability while the variation coefficient is V = 64 %. The average values of VMS obtained for the soils of individual streets and districts of the city vary significantly, too: from 80,3 to 314,6·10–5 Si units, which is almost 4 times. A histogram of the VMS of soils in Yakutsk was compiled, when the entire data array was divided into 7 ranks or classes with a step equal to 50·10– 5 Si units. As a result, the majority of all values (84 %) fit within the range up to 250·10–5 Si units, while only 16 % of the total number of measurements were above 250·10–5 Si units. According to the results of the study, it was also found that the total indicator of contamination of the studied soils with heavy metals (Zc) is associated with the VMS indicator with a strong positive (r = 0,937) statistically significant (n = 8, rst = 0,707, p = 0,95) correlation, almost approaching a linear relationship. The average VMS of the Yakutsk soils is comparable with the values determined for the industrial districts of Moscow (160–180·10–5 Si units), Perm (183·10–5 units Si), Mednogorsk (158·10–5 Si units), but at the same time it is much larger than the values obtained for large industrial cities in China, such as Hangzhou and Luoyang (128·10–5 Si units).
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. 0297-2021-0027, reg. No. АААА-А21- 121012190033-5)
About the Authors
A. P. Chevychelov
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
CHEVYCHELOV Alexander Pavlovich, Dr. Sci. (Biology), chief researcher
41 Lenina pr., Yakutsk 677000
ID-7565-2018
A. A. Alekseev
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ALEKSEEV Alexey Alekseevich, Laboratory Assistant
41 Lenina pr., Yakutsk 677000
L. I. Kuznetsova
Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
KUZNETSOVA Lyubov Ivanovna, Research Engineer
41 Lenina pr., Yakutsk 677000
References
1. Torgovkin N.V. Geohimicheskie osobennosti tekhnogennyh gruntov kriolitozony na primere territorii g. Yakutska: Avtoref. na soisk. uchenoj step. kand. Yakutsk, 2017. 21 p.
2. Solomonov N.G., Remigajlo P.A., Desyatkin R.V., Ohlopkov I.M., Isaev A.P., Zaharova V.I. Bioekologicheskie problemy krupnogo goroda na Severe (na primere g. Yakutska) // Vestnik SVFU. 2011. Vol. 8, No. 4. P. 32–39.
3. Sivceva N.E. Ekogeohimicheskie osobennosti formirovaniya urbanozemov v usloviyah kriolitozony (na primere g. Yakutska): avtoref. na soisk. uchenoj step. kand. biol. nauk. Yakutsk, 2012. 23 p.
4. Savvinov D.D., Makarova M.P., Timofeev A.G., Koval’skij D.V. Mikroelementy v pochvah prigorodnoj zony g. Yakutska // Nauka i obrazovanie. 2014. No. 2. P. 7–10.
5. Sivceva N.E., Legostaeva Ya.B., Makarov V.S., Vasil’ev N.F. Ekologicheskaya ocenka sostoyaniya territorii g. Yakutska po summarnomu pokazatelyu zagryazneniya pochvennogo pokrova // Vestnik SVFU. 2011. Vol. 8, No. 2. P. 30–35.
6. Makarov V.N. Ekologo-geohimicheskaya ocenka tekhnogennogo vozdejstviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu Yakutii // Geografiya i prirodnye resursy. 2010. No. 1. P. 45–48.
7. Shchelchkova M.V., Zhergotova M.S. Fermentativnaya aktivnost’merzlotnoj lugovo-chernozemnoj pochvy transportnoj zony «Aeroport – Yakutsk» // Nauka i obrazovanie. 2014. No. 2. P. 14–18.
8. Makarov V.N., Torgovkin N.V. Geohimicheskaya charakteristika tekhnogennyh otlozhenij (kul’turnogo sloya) v kriolitozone // Nauka i obrazovanie. 2017. No. 3. P. 38–45.
9. Soldatova V.Yu., Shadrina E.G., Karpova S.D. Biotestirovanie fitotoksichnosti pochvogruntov g. Yakutska s ispol’zovaniem testa ‒ ob″ekta ovsa posevnogo Avena Sativa L. // Prirodnye resursy Arktiki i Subarktiki. 2018. Vol. 24, No. 2. P. 76–86.
10. Makarov V.N., Torgovkin N.V. Zagryaznenie atmosfery goroda Yakutska vzveshennymi veshchestvami // Prirodnye resursy Arktiki i Subarktiki. 2020. Vol. 25, No. 1. P. 43–50.
11. Babanin V.F., Truhin V.I., Karpachevskij L.O., Ivanov A.V., Morozov V.V. Magnetizm pochv. Yaroslavl’: YAGTU, 1995. 223 p.
12. Mullins C.E. Magnetic susceptibility of the soils and its significance in soil science – a review // Journal of Soil Science. 1977. Vol. 28. P. 223–246.
13. Gladysheva M.A., Ivanov A.V., Stroganova M.N. Vyyavlenie areolov tekhnogenno-zagryaznennyh pochv Moskvy po ih magnitnoj vospriimchivosti // Pochvovedenie. 2007. No. 2. P. 235–242.
14. Vodyanickij Yu.N., Vasil’ev A.A., Lobanova E.S. Zagryaznennost’ tyazhelymi metallami i metalloidami pochv g. Perm’ // Agrohimiya. 2009. No. 4. P. 60–68.
15. Vodyanickij Yu.N., Shoba S.A. Magnitnaya vospriimchivost’ kak indikator zagryazneniya tyazhelymi metallami gorodskih pochv (obzor literatury) // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 17. Pochvovedenie. 2015. No. 1. P. 13–20.
16. Latyshenko K.P., Razumovskaya M.Yu. Ekspresskontrol’ gorodskih pochv na soderzhanie tyazhelyh metallov // Mir izmerenij. 2011. No. 7. P. 39–41.
17. Vasil’ev A.A., Lobanova E.S. Kartoskhema magnitnoj vospriimchivosti pochvennogo pokrova g. Permi // Permskij agrarnyj vestnik. 2013. No. 3(3). P. 24–27.
18. Reshetnikov M.V., Grebenyuk L.V., Kuznecov V.V. Prostranstvennoe raspredelenie magnitnoj vospriimchivosti pochv v predelah goroda Mednogorska (orenburgskaya oblast’) // Vestnik orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. No. 3(178). P. 177–182.
19. Makarov O.A., Kubarev E.N., Chistova O.A., Kareva O.V., Krikunenko A.S., Baldzhiev A.S. Magnitnaya vospriimchivost’ pochv na pridorozhnyh territoriyah // Zemledelie. 2019. No. 2. P. 17–20.
20. Lu S.G., Bou S.Q. Study on the correlation of magnetic properties an heavy metals content in urban soils of Hagzhou city, China // J. Appl. Geophys. 2006. Vol. 60. P. 1–12.
21. Lu S.G., Bou S.Q., Xue G.F. Magnetic properties as indicators of heavy metals pollution in urban topsoils: a case study from the city of Luoyang, China // Geophys. J. Intern. 2007. Vol. 171. P. 568–580.
22. Golden N., Potito A.P., Zhang C., Morrison L., Gipson P.J. Spatial patterns of metal contamination and magnetic susceptibility of soils at an Urban Bonfire site // Applied Geochemistry. 2015. Vol. 52. P. 86–96.
23. Makarov O.A., Yakovlev A.S., Toshcheva G.P., Ivanov A.V. Magnitnaya vospriimchivost’ pochv zheleznodorozhnyh ob’ektov CAO goroda Moskvy // Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost’. 2013. No. 2. P. 71–73.
24. Chevychelov A.P., Skrybykina V.P., Vasil’eva T.I. Geografo-geneticheskie osobennosti formirovaniya svojstv i sostava merzlotnyh pochv Central’noj Yakutii // Pochvovedenie. 2009. No. 6. P. 648–657.
25. Klimat Yakutska / Pod red. C.A. Shver, S.A. Izyumenko. L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1982. 247 p.
26. Vadyunina A.F., Korchagina Z.A. Metody issledovaniya fizicheskih svojstv pochv i gruntov. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1973. 399 p.
27. Yakutsk: geograficheskij atlas. M.: Komitet po geodezii i kartografii RF, 1992. 56 p.
28. Yakutsk: kartograficheskij atlas. Yakutsk: Mediyaholding «Yakutiya», 2012. 232 p.
29. Dmitriev E.A. Matematicheskaya statistika v pochvovedenii. M.: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM», 2009. 328 p.
30. Chislennost’ naseleniya gorodov Kitaya. URL: http://comparecites.org/ru/compare/Hangzl (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2020).
31. Chislennost’ 100 krupnejshih gorodovRossii. URL: http://www.sites.google.com/site/ruregdatav1/largest_cities_russia (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2020).
32. Sposob opredeleniya tekhnogennogo zagryazneniya pochv i donnyh osadkov metallami: pat. 2110068 Ros. Federaciya. N 93030153/28/ Molostovskij E.A., Eremin V.N; zayavl. 10.06.93, 2s.
33. Pavlov P.D., Bukatin M.D., Reshetnikov M.V., Eremin V.N. Sostoyanie pochvennogo pokrova v zone vliyaniya poligona tverdyh bytovyh othodov (na primere Balakovskogo poligona Saratovskoj oblasti) // Agrarnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2015. No. 2. P. 21–25.
Review
For citations:
Chevychelov A.P., Alekseev A.A., Kuznetsova L.I. The use of the magnetic susceptibility index of soils for the assessment of the ecological state of the soils in Yakutsk. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2021;26(1):78-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2021-26-1-8
Views:
117
Email this article 