The Saltaga-Tas Early Cretaceous granite massif in the northwest Verkhoyansk-Kolyma orogen: morphology, composition and formation conditions
https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2026-31-1-8-28
EDN: BDMIVK
Abstract
This study of the Early Cretaceous Saltaga-Tas granite massif (140–144 Ma) offers insights into the long-debated problem of how magmas are transported and emplaced in the upper crust. The article discusses the structure and composition of granites of the Saltaga-Tas Early Cretaceous massif, localized in the tension fault zone of the Syachan trough of the Uyandina-Yasachnaya island arc magmatic belt. The massif has a complex shape with a combination of chonolith, exposed to the bottom, at 800–1000 m, adjacent sheet body, exposed to full thickness (300–400 m) together with conduits and splitting at its northeastern end into a series of extended (3–5 km) apophyses. The parental melt was generated by partial melting of the lower crustal substrate, representing a mixture of crustal and mantle matter, under the influence of juvenile heat and HCl-enriched fluids. The melt was introduced along a series of steeply dipping faults with further spread along weakened boundary of unconformity between two series of the volcanogenicterrigenous rocks and uplift of the overlying stratum. The massif is dominated by fractionated leucogranites. High melt temperatures (up to 986 °С), amphibole-biotite composition, belonging to the magnetite-ilmenite series, lower crustal genesis makes them similar to I-type granites, whereas the composition of biotites, the ratio of petrogenic oxides and a number of geochemical coefficients correspond to those of S-type granites. Moreover, an increase in silica acidity and total alkalinity of granites from the bottom to the apical horizons of the massif has been established. Correspondingly, on a haplogranite diagram, the evolutionary trend points toward the quartz apex. According to the geological position of the massif, intruding both island-arc and collisional igneous formations of the region, and to most geochemical criteria, the geodynamic setting of granite formation is defined as post-collisional (late orogenic). Finally, confinedness of numerous alkaline-basic dikes to the massif is due to the occurrence of bimodal magmatism here in post-collisional times with simultaneous melting of crustal and mantle substrates.
Keywords
About the Author
V. A. TrunilinaRussian Federation
Vera Arkadyevna Trunilina, Dr. Sci. (Geol. and Mineral.), Chief Researcher
Laboratory of Geodynamics and Regional Geology
Yakutsk
References
1. White A.J. Source of granite magma. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs. 1979;11:539.
2. Moyen J.F., Laurent O., Chelle-Michou C., et al. Collision vs. subduction-related magmatism: Two contrasting ways of granite formation and implications for crustal growth. Lithos. 2017;277:154–177. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2016.09.018
3. Clemens D., Stevens G., Farina F. The enigmatic sources of I-type granites: The peritectic connexion. Lithos. 2011; 126:174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos2011.07.04.
4. McDonough W.F., Sun S.S. The composition of the Earth. Chemical Geology. 1995;120(3):223–253. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4
5. Hofmann A.W. Mantle geochemistry: the message from oceanic volcanism. Nature. 1997;385:219–228. doi: 10.1038/385219a0
6. Rudnik R.L., Gao S. Composition of the Continental Crust. In: Holland E.D., Turekian K.K. (eds.) Treatise on Geochemistry (Second Edition). Elsevier; 2014, pp. 1–51. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00301-6
7. Copley A., Weller O., Bain H. Diapirs of crystal‑rich slurry explain granite emplacement temperature and duration. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:13730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40805-2 EDN: FHHYCB
8. Petford N., Cruden A.R., McCaffrey K.J.W., Vigneresse J.-L. Granite magma formation, transport and emplacement in the Earth’s crust. Nature. 2000;408:669–673. doi: 10.1038/35047000
9. Corti G., Moratti G., Sani F. Relations between surface faulting and granite intrusions in analogue models of strike-slip deformation. Journal of Structural Geology. 2005;27(9):1547–1562. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.011
10. Galland O., Cobbold P.R., de Bremond d’Ars J., Hallot E. Rise and emplacement of magma during horizontal shortening of the brittle crust: Insights from experimental modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth. 2007;112:B06402. doi: 10.1029/2006JB00460
11. Brown E.H., McClelland W.C. Pluton emplacement by sheeting and vertical ballooning in part of the southeast Coast plutonic complex, British Columbia. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 2000;112(5):708–719. doi: 10.1130/00167606(2000)112%3C0708:PEBSAV%3E2.3.CO;2
12. Nekrasov I.Ya. Magmatism and ore deposits of the northwestern Verkhoyansk-Chukotka fold area. Moscow: Nauka; 1962. 333 p. (In Russ.)
13. Trunilina V.A., Roev S.P., Orlov Yu.S., Oxman V.S. Magmatism of various geodynamic environments (zone of junction of the Verkhoyansk margin of the Siberian continent and the Kolyma-Omolon microcontinent). Yakutsk: Publishing House of YaSc SB RAS; 1999. 168 p. (In Russ.)
14. Petrov Yu.N., Shulgina V.S., Simonova L.S., et al. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation scale 1 :200,000. Second edition. The Yano-Indigirskaya series. Sheet R-54-XXXIII,XXXIV (Uyandinsky). An explanatory note. Moscow: Moscow Branch of FSBI VSEGEI; 2020. 283 p. (In Russ.)
15. Tectonics, Geodynamics and Metallogeny of the Sakha Republic (Yakutia). Parfenov L.M., Kuz’min M.I. (eds.) Moscow: MAIK Nauka/Inteperiodica; 2001. 571p. (In Russ.)
16. Layer P.W., Newberry R., Fujita K., et al. Tectonic setting of the plutonic belts of Yakutia, northeast Russia, based on 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and trace element geochemistry. Geology. 2001;29(2):167–173.
17. Putirka K.D. Igneous thermometers and barometers based on plagioclase + liquid equilibria: Tests of some existing models and new calibrations. American Mineralogist. 2005;90(2-3): 336–346. doi: 10.2138/am.2005.1449
18. Rudolfi R., Renzolli A. Calcic amphiboles in calc-alkaline and alkaline magmas: thermobarometric and chemometric empirical equations valid up to 1130o C and 2,2 GPa. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 2012;163:877–895. doi: 10.1007/s00410-011-0704-6.
19. Putirka K. Amphibole thermometers and barometers for igneous systems and some implications for eruption mechanismus of felsic magmas at arc volcanoes. American Mineralogist. 2016;101(4):841–858. doi: 10.2138/am-2016-5506
20. Uchida E., Endo S., Makino V. Relationship between solidification depth of granitic rocks and formation of hydrothermal ore deposits. Resource Geology. 2007;57(1):47–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-3928.2006.00004.x
21. Henry D.A., Guidotti Ch.V., Thompson J.A. The Tisaturation surface for low-to-medium pressure metapelitic biotites: Implications for geothermometry and Ti-substitution mechanismus. American Mineralogist. 2005;90(2-3):316–328. doi: 10.2138/am.2005.1498
22. Wones D.R., Eugster H.P. Stability of biotite: experiment, theory and application. American Mineralogist. 1965; 50(9):1228–1272. Available at: http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM50/AM50_1228.pdf
23. Gusev A.I. The typezation of granitoids on the foundation of composition biotites. Advances in Current Natural Sciences. 2009;(4):54–57. (In Russ.)
24. Brimhall G.H., Crerar D.A. Ore fluids: Magmatic to supergene. In: Carmichael I., Eugster H. (eds). Termodynamic and modeling of geological materials: Minerals, fluids and melts. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 1987, pp. 235–322. doi: 10.1515/9781501508950-010
25. Abdel-Rahman A-F.M. Nature of biotites from alkaline, calc-alkaline, and peraluminous magmas. Journal of Petrology. 1994;35(2):525–541. doi: 10.1093/petrology/35.2.525
26. Putirka K.D. Thermometers and barometers for volcanic systems. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry. 2008;69:61–120. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2008.69.3
27. Yavuz F. Win Pyrox: A Windows program for pyroxene calculation classification and thermobarometry. American Mineralogist. 2013;98(7):1338–1359. doi: 10.2138/am.2013.4292 EDN: RNWXVD
28. Sharpenok L.N., Kostin A.E., Kukharenko E.A. TAS-diagram sum of alkalis-silica for chemical classification and diagnostics of plutonic rocks. Regional Geology and Metallogeny. 2013;56:40–50. (In Russ.)
29. Strekeisen A., Le Maitre P.W. A chemical approximation to the modal QAPF classification of igneous rocks. Neues Yahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Abhandlungen. 1979;136:169–206.
30. Maniar P.D., Piccoli P.M. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 1989;101(5):635–643. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101%3C0635:tdog%3E2.3.co;2
31. Frost B.R., Barnes C.G., Collins W.J., et al. A geochemical classification for granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology. 2001;42:2033–2048.
32. Maeda J. Opening of the Kuril Basin deduced from the magmatic history of Central Hokkaido, northern Japan. Tectonophysics. 1990;174(3):235–255. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90324-2
33. Datsenko V.М. Petrogeochemical typification of granitoids of the south-western framing of the Siberian platform. In: Yushkin N.P. (ed.). Petrography at the turn of the 21<sup>st</sup> century: Achievements and prospects. Proceedings of the Second AllRussian Petrographic Conference, Volume 2. Syktyvkar, June 27–30, 2000. Syktyvkar: Institute of Geology, Komi Scientific Center; 2000, pp. 270–274. (In Russ.)
34. Whalen J.B., Hildebrand R.S., de Juan C. Trace element discrimination of arc, slab failure, and A-type granitic rocks. Lithos. 2019;348-349:105179. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.105179
35. Gerdes A., Worner G., Henk A. Post-collisional granite generation and HT-LP metamorphism by radiogenic heating: the Variscan South Bohemian Batholith. Journal of the Geological Society. 2000;157(3):577–587. doi: 10.1144/jgs.157.3.577
36. Jung S., Pfander J.A. Source composition and melting temperatures of orogenic granitoids – constrains from CaO/Na<sub>2</sub>O, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> and accessory mineral saturation thermometry. European Journal of Mineralogy. 2007;19(6):859–870. doi: 10.1127/0935-1221/2007/0019-1774
37. Belyaev G.М., Rudnik V.А. Formational-genetic types of granitoids. Leningrad: Nedra; 1978. 168 p. (In Russ.)
38. Janoušek V., Farrow C.M., Erban V. Interpretation of whole-rock geochemical data in igneous geochemistry: Introducing Geochemical Data Toolkit (GCDkit). Journal of Petrology. 2006;47(6):1255–1259. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egl013
39. Ovchinnikov L.N. Applied geochemistry; Мoscow: Nedra; 1990. 248 p. (In Russ.)
40. Thornton C.P., Tuttle O.F. Chemistry of igneous rocks, differentiation index. American Journal of Science. 1960; 258(11):664–684.
41. Sokolova E.N., Smirnov S.Z., Astrelina E.I., et al. Ongonite-elvan magmas of the Kalguty ore-magmatic system (Gorny Altai): Composition, fluid regime, and genesis of. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2011;52(11):1748–1775. (In Russ.) doi: 10.1016/j.rgg.2011.10.017 EDN: ONQJHP
42. Irber W. The lanthanide tetrad effect and its correlation with K/Rb, Eu/Eu*, Sr/Eu, Y/Ho, and Zr/Hf of evolving peraqluminous granite suites. Geochemica et Cosmochemica Acta. 1999;63(3):489–508. doi: 10.1016/s0016-7037(99)00027-7
43. Regelous A., Scharfenberg L., De Wall H. Origin of S-, A- and I-type granites: Petrogenetic evidence from whole rock Th/U ratio variations. Minerals. 2021;11(7). doi: 10.3390/min11070672
44. Chappell B.W., White A.J.R. Two contrasting granite types: 25 years later. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2001;48(4):489–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-0952.2001.00882.x
45. Patino Douce A.E. What do experiments tell us about the relative contributions of crust and mantle to the origin of granitic magmas? Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 1999;168(1):55–75. doi: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1999.168.01.05
46. King P.L., White A.J.R., Chappell B.W., Allen C.M. Characterization and Origin of aluminous A-type Granites from the Lachlan Fold Belt, Southeastern Australia. Journal of Petrology. 1997;38(3):371–391. doi: 10.1093/petroj/38.3.371
47. Martin R.F. A-type granites of crustal origin ultimately result from open-system fenitization-type reactions in an extensional environment. Lithos. 2006;91(1-4):125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.03.012
48. Yadav B.S., Ahmad T., Kaulina T., et al. Origin of postcollisional A-type granites in the Mahakoshal Supracrustal Belt, Central Indian Tectonic Zone, India: Zircon U–Pb ages and geochemical evidences. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 2020;191:104247. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2020.104247
49. Batchellor R.A., Bowden P. Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters. Chemical Geology. 1985;48(1-4):43–55. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(85)90034-8
50. Pearce J.A., Harris N.B.W., Tindle A.G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of the granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology. 1984;25(4):956–963. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956
Review
For citations:
Trunilina V.A. The Saltaga-Tas Early Cretaceous granite massif in the northwest Verkhoyansk-Kolyma orogen: morphology, composition and formation conditions. Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2026;31(1):8-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2026-31-1-8-28. EDN: BDMIVK
JATS XML









