Preview

Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources

Advanced search

Сomposition and U-Pb age of igneous rocks of the Evotinsky massif (Southern Yakutia, Aldan-Stanovoy shield)

https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2025-30-4-572-588

Abstract

Determining the metallogenic specialization of igneous rocks in ore districts remains a pressing and often controversial challenge. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive approach, that integrates petrographic and petrogeochemical data with geochronological studies of individual formations. Such integrated analysis, when contextualized within specific formation conditions and metallogenic assessments, provides a robust framework for interpretation. The Evotinsky massif, located within the eponymous Evotinsky placer ore region in the central Aldan-Stanovoy shield, represents one such critical formation. This study investigates its petrogenesis based on rock samples collected 
during fieldwork from 2018 to 2020, focusing on the massif’s main phases. Subsequent processing and major element analysis were performed using silicate and multielement techniques at the Department of Physicochemical Analysis Methods of the Diamond and Precious Metals Geology Institute SB RAS (Yakutsk). Trace element concentrations were determined by mass spectrometry at the САС Plasma LLC laboratory (Tomsk). Finally, geochronological U-Pb dating of zircons was conducted using SIMS (SHRIMP-II) at the Center for Isotope Research of the Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI). The Evotinsky massif displays an antidromous structure and comprises two intrusive phases: an earlier phase of amphibole quartz syenites and a later phase of amphibole-pyroxene quartz monzonites. The rocks are classified within the high potassium calc-alkaline series, corresponding to derivatives of the shoshonite-latite series. Geochemical data indicate a mixed mantle and crustal source for the magmas. Petrochemical parameters and trace element ratios (Rb, Y, Yb, Ta) show compositions analogous to volcanic rocks from continental margins and island arcs. U-Pb zircon geochronology (SHRIMP II) constrains the emplacement of the amphibole quartz syenites to 119 ± 1 Ma and the amphibole-pyroxene quartz monzonites to 117 ± 1 Ma (Aptian, Early Cretaceous). In conclusion, the Evotinsky massif formed under back-arc extensional conditions during the final stages of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean closure. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate the massif’s significant potential for gold mineralization.

About the Authors

M. S. Ivanov
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Yakutsk



A. I. Ivanov
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ivanov, Michil Spartakovich, Junior Researcher

ResearcherID: AAL-7447-2021
Scopus Author ID: 57212410522

Yakutsk



A. I. Zhuravlev
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ivanov, Alexey Ivanovich, Cand. Sci. (Geol. and Mineral.), Senior Researcher

ResearcherID: JBR-7954-2023

Scopus Author ID: 57674640500

Yakutsk



E. E. Loskutov
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Zhuravlev, Anatolii Ivanovich, Junior Researcher

ResearcherID: AAC-6095-2019
Scopus Author ID: 57200217371

Yakutsk



A. A. Kravchenko
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Kravchenko, Alexander Alexanderovich , Cand. Sci. (Geol. and Mineral.), Senior Researcher

Scopus Author ID: 15750892800

Yakutsk



V. E. Guzev
Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI)
Russian Federation

Guzev, Vladislav Evgenievich, Cand. Sci. (Geol. and Mineral.), Leading Geologist

Scopus Author ID: 57355951700

St. Petersburg



A. V. Terekhov
Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI)
Russian Federation

Terekhov, Artem Valerievich, Cand. Sci. (Geol. and Mineral.), Head of Department

Scopus Author ID: 57215378338

St. Petersburg



References

1. Tectonics, geodynamics and metallogeny of the territory of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Responsible editors: doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences L.M. Parfenov, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences M.I. Kuzmin. Moscow: MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodika”;2001. 571 p. (In Russ.)

2. Molchanov A.V., Terekhov A.V., Shatov V.V., et al. Gold ore districts and ore clusters of the Aldanian metallogenic province. Regional Geology and Metallogeny. 2017;(71):93–111. (In Russ.)

3. Ivanov A.I., Loskutov E.E., Ivanov M.S., Zhuravlev A.I. Petrography, geochemical features and absolute dating of the mesozoic igneous rocks of Medvedev and Taezhniy Massifs (Southeast Russia, Aldan Shield). Minerals. 2022;12(12):1516 https://doi.org/10.3390/min12121516

4. Kravchenko A.A., Smelov A.P., Berezkin V.I., Popov N.V. Geology and genesis of Precambrian gold-bearing metabasites of the central part of the Aldan-Stanovoy shield (P. Pinigin deposit). Yakutsk: Offset; 2010. 148 p. (In Russ.)

5. Amarsky V.G. The connection between ore formation and magmatism (Evotinsky district of the Aldan shield). News of the TB of the GC of the USSR. 1971;7(2):11–18. (In Russ.)

6. Vigneresse J.L. The role of discontinuous magma inputs in felsic magma and ore generation. Ore Geology Reviews.2007;30(3-4):181–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2006.

7.

8. Bogatikov O.A., Morozov A.F., Petrov O.V. Petrographic Code of Russia. Magmatic, metamorphic, metasomatic, impact formations. Saint-Petersburg: VSEGEI; 2009. 160 p. (In Russ.)

9. Sharpenok L.N. Practical petrology: methodological recommendations for the study of igneous formations in relation to the tasks of state geological maps. Saint-Petersburg: VSEGEI; 2017. 168 p. (In Russ.)

10. Wilson M. Review of igneous petrogenesis: A global tectonic approach. London.: Unwin Hyman; 1989. 466 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6788-4

11. Middlemost E.A. Magmas and magmatic rocks. an introduction to igneous petrology. London, New-York.: Longman; 1985. 266 p.

12. De la Roche H., Leterrier J., Grandclaude P., Marchal M. A classification of volcanic and plutonic rocks using R1–R2-diagram and major-element analyses – Its relationships with current nomenclature. Chemical Geology. 1980;29(1):183210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(80)90020-0

13. Whitford D.J., Nicholls I.A., Taylor S.R. Spatial Variations in the geochemistry of quaternary lavas across the Sunda arc in Java and Bali. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 1979;70:341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00375361

14. Goldschmidt V.M. Geochemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1954. 730 p.

15. Tauson L.V. Geochemical types and potential ore-bearing capacity of granitoids. Moscow: Nauka; 1977. 280 p. (In Russ.)

16. Pearce J.A. Trace element characteristics of lavas from destructive plate boundries. In: Thorpe R.S. (ed.) Andesites: Orogenic Andesites and Related Rocks. New York: Wiley; 1982, рр. 525–548.

17. Sun S.S., McDonough W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. Geological Society. Special Publications. 1989;42(1):313–345. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19

18. McDonough W.F., Sun S.-S., Ringwood A.E., et al. Potassium, rubidium and cesium in the Earth and Moon and the evolution of the mantle of the Earth. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.1992;56(3):1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/00167037(92)90043-I

19. Eby G.N. The A-Type granitoids: A review of their occurrence and chemical characteristics and speculations on their petrogenesis. Lithos. 1990;26(1-2):115–134. https://doi.org/10./0024-4937(90)90043-Z

20. Balashov Yu.A. Geochemistry of rare earth elements. Moscow: Nauka; 1976. 267 p. (In Russ.)

21. Whalen J.B., Kenneth L., Currie K.L., Chappel B.W. A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis. Contributions to. Mineralogy and Petrology. 1987;95(2):603–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402202

22. Datsenko V.M. Petrogeochemical typification of granitoids of the southwestern framing of the Siberian Platform. In: Petrography at the turn of the 21st century: Results and prospects: Proceedings of the Second All-Russian Petrographic Conference, Syktyvkar, June 27–30, 2000. Syktyvkar: Institute of Geology of the Komi Scientific Center URO RAS; 2000, pp. 270274. (In Russ.)

23. Taylor S.R., McLennan S.M. Continental crust, its composition and evolution. Moscow: Mir Publ.; 1988. 380 p. (In Russ.)

24. Arculus R.J., Powell R. Source component mixing in the regions of arc magma generation. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1986;91:5913–5926. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB06p05913

25. Turkina O.M. Lectures on geochemistry of magmatic and metamorphic processes: a tutorial. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. 2014. 118 p. (In Russ.)

26. Kochetkov A.Y., Lazebnick K.A. Alkaline Ultrabasic and Basic Rocks of Yakokut Massif (Central Aldan). In: Kovalsky V.V., et al. (eds.) Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Basalts and Ultrabasites of Siberian Platform. Yakutsk: YaF AS USSR; 1984, pp. 62–82. (In Russ.)

27. Prokopyev I.R., Doroshkevich A.G., Ponomarchuk A.V., et al. U-Pb SIMS and Ar-Ar geochronology, petrography, mineralogy and gold mineralization of the late Mesozoic Amga alkaline rocks (Aldan shield, Russia). Ore Geology Reviews. 2019;109:520–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.05.011

28. Velikoslavinsky S.D., Kotov A.B., Sal’nikova E.B., et al. The U-PB age of the Fedorov sequence of the Aldan granulitegneiss megacomplex, the Aldan shield. Doklady Earth Sciences.

29. ;393(8):1151–1155.

30. Tischendorf G., Pälchen W. Zur Klassifikation von Granitoiden. Zeitschrift fuer Geologische Wissenschaften. 1985;13: 615–627.

31. Pearce J.A., Harris N.B.W., Tindle A.G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology. 1984;25:956–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/25.4.956

32. Müller D., Rock N.M.S., Groves D.I. Geochemical discrimination between shoshonitic and potassic volcanic rocks in different tectonic settings: A pilot study. Mineralogy and Petrology. 1992;46:259289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01173568

33. Batchelor R.A., Bowden P. Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters. Chemical Geology. 1985;48(1-4):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/00092541(85)90034-8

34. Blevin P.L., Chappell B.W. The role of magma sources, oxidation states and fractionation in determining the granite metallogeny of eastern Australia. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 1992;83(1-2):305–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263593300007987

35. Maximov E.P., Nikitin V.M., Uyutov V.I. The Central Aldan gold-uranium ore magmatogenic system, Aldan-Stanovoy shield, Russia. Russian Journal of Pacific Geology. 2010;4(2):95–115.

36. Zhuravlev A.I., Nikiforova Z.S., Kravchenko A.A., et al. Mineralogical and geochemical features of native gold from placers of the Evotinsky gold-bearing region (South Yakutia). In: Baikal youth scientific conference on geology and geophysics: Proceedings of the 6th All-Russian youth scientific conference dedicated to the memory of academician N.L. Dobretsov, Ulan-Ude – Goryachinsk, August 23–27, 2021. Ulan-Ude: BSC SB RAS. 2021, pp. 49–51. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31554/978-5-7925-0604-6-2021-49-51

37.


Review

For citations:


Ivanov M.S., Ivanov A.I., Zhuravlev A.I., Loskutov E.E., Kravchenko A.A., Guzev V.E., Terekhov A.V. Сomposition and U-Pb age of igneous rocks of the Evotinsky massif (Southern Yakutia, Aldan-Stanovoy shield). Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 2025;30(4):572-588. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2025-30-4-572-588

Views: 229

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2618-9712 (Print)
ISSN 2686-9683 (Online)