Thermal imaging technologies in the study of animals

Thermal imaging technology, commonly referred to as infrared thermography (IRT), has become a valuable non-invasive method for investigating various physiological processes, health conditions, and behavioral responses in animals. This method enables the recording of surface body temperature distribution, allowing for contactless assessment of thermoregulation, stress levels, inflammatory processes, and certain adaptive mechanisms in animals. IRT is frequently used to monitor animals during physical activities under conditions where maintaining thermal homeostasis is critical, including exposure to complex environmental stressors. Moreover, it is used in studies examining behavioral responses across diverse animal species, such as social interactions and adaptation to climate change. This article reviews modern approaches and applications of thermal imaging technology in research involving both domestic and wild mammal species. It highlights the effective integration of IRT with other diagnostic and observational methods, making it a valuable tool not only in biomedical research but also in environmental and physiological studies. Additionally, the article discusses future prospects for this technology, including its integration with unmanned aerial vehicles (drones), artificial intelligence systems, and mobile platforms. Progress in standardizing research protocols for assessing specific physiological responses in animals under various conditions is expected to enhance both fundamental and applied research. These developments will also promote the wider use of thermal maging technologies, particularly in horse breeding.

1. Ring E.F. The historical development of temperature measurement in medicine. Infrared Physics & Technology. 2007;49(3):297–301.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2006. 06.029

2. Hovei K., Durek K., Soroko M. Thermal camera performance and image analysis repeatability in equine thermography. Infrared Physics & Technology.2020;110:103447.https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103447

3. Soroko M., Davies M. Equine Thermografhy in practice. Cabi; 2016. 116 р.

4. Hänninen L., Pastell M., Keeling L.J., et al. Thermographic assessment of stress in horses during different handling procedures. Physiology & Behavior. 2009;98(5):633–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.09.002

5. Turner T.A. Thermography as a tool for evaluating equine lameness. AAEP Proceedings. 2003;49:130–132.

6. Amory J.R., Wright I.A., Mason C.S. The use of infrared thermography to assess surface temperature changes in horses following treadmill exercise. The Veterinary Journal. 2002;164(2): 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2002.0715

7. McCafferty D.J. The value of infrared thermography for research on mammals: previous applications and future directions. Mammal Review. 2007;37(3):207–223.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00103.x

8. Jones J.P., Asner G.P., Butchart S.H., Karanth K.U. The ‘why’, ‘what’ and ‘how’ of monitoring for conservation. In: Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library; 2013:327–343.

9. Larsen H.L., Møller-Lassesen K., Enevoldsen E.M.E., et al. Drone with Mounted Thermal Infrared Cameras for Monitoring Terrestrial Mammals. Drones. 2023;7(11):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7110680

10. Havens K.J., Sharp E.J. Chapter 11 – Using Thermal Imagers for Animal Ecology. In: Havens K.J., Sharp E.J., eds. Thermal Imaging Techniques to Survey and Monitor Animals in the Wild. Academic Press; 2016:245–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803384-5.00011-7

11. Rietz J., van Beeck Calkoen S.S., Ferry N., et al. Dronebased thermal imaging in the detection of wildlife carcasses and disease management. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2023;2023:5517000. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5517000

12. Chang B., Hwang B., Lim W., et al. Enhancing wildlife detection using thermal imaging drones: designing the fl Path. Drones. 2025;9(1):52.https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9010052

13. Hermann J., Topac Y., Hoffmann J., et al. User-Centric Wildlife Monitoring: AI-Powered Animal Detection and Tracking with Drone-Based Thermal Imaging. In: Proceedings of Woodstock ’18: ACM Symposium on Neural Gaze Detection; 2018 Jun 3–5; Woodstock, NY. New York, NY: ACM; 2018:12 p.

14. JOUAV. How to Use Drones for Wildlife Conservation? JOUAV Blog. 2023. URL: https://www.jouav.com/blog/wildlife-drone.html (дата обращения: 12.04.2025).

15. Dawson S., Adams P., Low T., et al. Automated thermal imagery analysis platform for multiple pest species. Canberra: Centre for Invasive Species Solutions; 2022. 28 p. ISBN 978-1922971-00-5.

16. Kirsanov V.V., Pavkin D.Yu., Dovlatov I.M., et al. Development of a mathematical model for determining the condition of cattle hooves based on thermogram profiles. Agroengineering. 2022;24(5):35–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26897/26871149-2022-5-35-39

17. Kang X., Zhang X.D., Liu G. A Review: Development of computer vision-based lameness detection for dairy cows and discussion of the practical applications. Sensors. 2021;21(3):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030753

18. Lokesh Babu D.S., Jeyakumar S., Patil J.V., et al. Monitoring foot surface temperature using infrared thermal imaging for assessment of hoof health status in cattle: a review. Journal of Thermal Biology. 2018;78:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.08.021

19. Harris-Bridge G., Young L., Handel I., et al. The use of infrared thermography for detecting digital dermatitis in dairy cattle: What is the best measure of temperature and foot location to use? The Veterinary Journal. 2018;237:26–33.

20. Verduzco-Mendoza A., Olmos-Hernández A., BuenoNava A., et al. Thermal imaging in biomedical research: a noninvasive technology for animal models. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2025;12:1544112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1544112.

21. Zhilich E.D., Rogalskaya Yu.N., Kolosko D.N. Application of the thermography method for identifi of mammary gland disease in cows. Engineering and technology in animal husbandry. 2022;(2):108–112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51794/2713-2064-2022-2-108

22. Mansoor Nabi, et al. Assessing the potential of infrared thermography for early detection of subclinical mastitis in crossbred cows. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry. 2025;10(2):08–15.

23. Stewart M., et al. Eye temperature and health status in cattle measured using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior. 2008;93(4–5):858–866.

24. McCafferty D.J. The value of infrared thermography for research on mammals: previous applications and future directions. Mammal Review. 2007;37(3):207–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00113.x.

25. Wang L., et al. Monitoring of deep vein thrombosis in a rabbit model using infrared thermography. Biomedical Optics Express. 2018;9(6):2783–2795. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.002783.

26. Jeng, J.C., et al. Skin temperature changes in secondand third-degree burns in a porcine model using infrared thermography. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation.2003;24(5):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004623-200309000-00006

27. Vitorino, D.V., et al. Infrared thermography as a method to assess thermal comfort in horses (Equus caballus). Journal of Thermal Biology.2019;85:102410.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.102410.

28. Dymek K., Eksell P., Wattle O., Roepstorff L. Use of thermography to detect subclinical lameness in horses. Equine Veterinary Journal. 2006; 38. № 5; 454–458. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2023-0023

29. Amory J.R., Wright I.A., Mason C.S. The use of infrared thermography to assess surface temperature changes in horses following treadmill exercise. The Veterinary Journal. 2002;164(2):148–153.

30. Kruljc. Thermographic Examination of the Horse. Acta Veterinaria; 2023: 73. 289–316. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve2023-0023.

31. Aragona F., Rizzo M., Arfuso F., et al. Eye temperature measured with infrared thermography to assess stress responses to road transport in horses. Animals. 2024; 14(13):1877. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani14131877.

32. Travain T., Colombo E. S., Grandi L. C., et al. How good is this food? A study on dogs’ emotional responses to a potentially pleasant situation using infrared thermography. Physiology & Behavior. 2016;155: 99–105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.11.036.

33. Domino M., Borowska M., Kozłowska N., et al. Advances in thermal image analysis for the detection of pregnancy in horses using infrared thermography. Sensors. 2022; 22: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22010191

34. Daniel A., Ferdous S., Mathew A., Amanda J. Collectively advancing deep learning for animal detection in drone imagery: Successes, challenges, and research gaps. Ecological Informatics. 2024;83:102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102842.

35. Jinxin Liang, Zhiyu Yuan, Xinhui Luo, et al. Application of non-invasive monitoring technology in intensive sheep farming: A review. Smart Agricultural Technology. 2025;12: 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101215.

36. Reddy C., Kumar S., Sharma S., Natesan G., et al. Realtime tracking of wildlife with iot solutions in movement ecology. Journal of Advanced Zoology. 2023; 44: 1122–1134. https://doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v44iS-5.1191.

37. Meivel S., Karthikraja R., Mohamad Sajudeen S., Rokith K. Thermal imaging based animal intrusion using artificial intelligence. May 2021. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.

38. Hermann J., Topac Y., Hoffmann J., et al. User-centric wildlife monitoring: ai-powered animal detection and tracking with drone-based thermal imaging. In: Woodstock ’18: ACM Symposium on Neural Gaze Detection, June 03–05, 2018. Woodstock, NY . ACM, New York, NY, USA;2018. 12 pages.

39. Dave B., Mori M., Bathani A., Goel P. Wild animal detection using YOLOv8. Procedia Computer Science.2023; 230: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.12.065.

40. Rogalski A. Infrared detectors: advances and applications. Progress in Quantum Electronics. 2022; 85: 100421.

41. Oikonomou G., et al. Multimodal imaging in veterinary medicine: combining thermography with MRI and CT for improved diagnosis in equine and canine patients. Veterinary Journal. 2021; 278: 105743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105743.

42. Hartmann M., Schott M., Dsouza,A., et al. A text and image analysis workflow using citizen science data to extract relevant social media records: Combining red kite observations from Flickr, eBird and iNaturalist. Ecological Informatics. 2022;71: 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101782.

43. Alekseev N.D., Neustroev M.P., Ivanov R.V. Biological basis for increasing the productivity of horses. Yakutsk; 2006: 280 p. (In Russ.)

44. Vinokurov N.T., Vladimirov L.N., Machakhtyrova V.A. Peculiarities of the dynamics of changes in the live weight of Yakut horses in winter. Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2012; 4: 80–82. (In Russ.)