Modeling the water level regime of intrapermafrost waters and their runoff in Central Yakutia: A case study of the Eruu source catchment area

In permafrost regions, the combined effects of climate change and increased anthropogenic activity highlight the need to study the formation processes and dynamics of supraand intrapermafrost waters, due to their strong responsiveness to external influences. When continuous year-round observations are not possible, numerical modeling provides an efficient approach to study groundwater dynamics. This study aims to construct a mathematical model of suprapermafrost and intrapermafrost groundwater flow prevalent along the right bank of the Lena River in Central Yakutia, and to evaluate the interannual variability of these groundwater resources. A three-dimensional groundwater flow model was developed using the MODFLOW-USG software. This model was constructed using baseline data obtained from extensive, long-term field investigations in hydrogeology and geocryology conducted within the catchment area of a perennial icing spring located on the Bestyakh Terrace of the Lena River. The numerical model was calibrated using field-observed water levels from a monitoring well located within the intrapermafrost water transit zone. Calibration involved iterative adjustments of hydraulic parameters and boundary conditions until the deviation between simulated and observed intrapermafrost water levels was less than 0.1 m for more than 90% of the measurements. The simulation results enabled the reconstruction of the water yield dynamics in the intrapermafrost aquifer talik over the past 15 years, clarified the effects of various meteorological factors and seasonal freeze-thaw cycles on groundwater regime formation, and provided a quantitative evaluation of spring discharge variability at intra-annual scales. These findings establish a foundation for developing predictive frameworks of permafrost-hydrogeological evolution in response to climatic variability and provide a robust methodological approach for quantifying groundwater dynamics in permafrost-affected regions. 

1. Piguzova V.M., Shepelev V.V. Methodology for the study of aufeis. Yakutsk: Melnikov Permafrost Institute SB RAS; 1975. 62 p. (In Russ.)

2. Romanovsky N.N. Groundwater in the cryolithozone. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1983. 231 p. (In Russ.).

3. Hornum M.T., Hodson A.J., Jessen S., et al. Numerical modelling of permafrost spring discharge and open-system pingo formation induced by basal permafrost aggradation. The Cryosphere. 2020;14(12):4627–4651. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4627-2020.

4. Liao C., Zhuang Q. Quantifying the role of permafrost distribution in groundwater and surface water interactions using a three-dimensional hydrological model. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research. 2017;49(1):81–100. https://doi.org/ 10.1657/aaar0016-022.

5. Liu W., Fortier R., Molson J., Lemieux J.M. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of cryo-hydrogeological processes in a river-talik system in a continuous permafrost environment. Water Resources Research. 2022;58(3):e2021WR031630. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021wr031630.

6. Riseborough D., Shiklomanov N., Etzelmüller B., et al. Recent advances in permafrost modelling. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes. 2008;19:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.615.

7. Grinevsky S.O. Hydrogeodynamic modeling of the interaction between underground and surface waters. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2012. 152 p. (In Russ.).

8. Frampton A., Painter S.L., Destouni G. Permafrost degradation and subsurface-flow changes caused by surface warming trends. Hydrogeology Journal. 2013;21(1):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-012-0938-z.

9. Woo M.K., Kane D.L., Carey S.K., et al. Progress in permafrost hydrology in the new millennium. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes. 2008;19(2):237–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.613.

10. Shtengelov R.S. Hydrogeodynamic calculations on a computer: A textbook. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1994. 335 p. (In Russ.)

11. Koch J.C., McKnight D.M., Neupauer R.M. Simulating unsteady flow, anabranching, and hyporheic dynamics in a glacial meltwater stream using a coupled surface water routing and groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research. 2011;47(5):W05530. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009508.

12. Ge S., McKenzie J., Voss C., et al. Exchange of groundwater and surface‐water mediated by permafrost response to seasonal and long-term air temperature variation. Geophysical Research Letters. 2011;38(14):L14402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl047911.

13. Gaiolini M., Colombani N., Busico G., et al. Impact of boundary conditions dynamics on groundwater budget in the Campania region (Italy). Water. 2022;14(16):2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14162462.

14. Iwata Y., Hayashi M., Hirota T. Comparison of snowmelt infiltration under different soil-freezing conditions influenced by snow cover. Vadose Zone Journal. 2008;7(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0089.

15. Zhang T. Influence of the seasonal snow cover on the ground thermal regime: An overview. Reviews of Geophysics. 2005;43(4):RG4002. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004rg000157.

16. Pavlova N.A., Shepelev V.V., Galanin A.A., et al. Groundwater hydrochemistry of suprapermafrost–intrapermafrost fl in their discharge areas in Central Yakutia. Water Resources. 2020;47(4):581–590. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807820040119.

17. Efimov A.I. The Ulakhan-Taryn Unfreezing Freshwater Source in Central Yakutia. In: Research on permafrost in Yakutia. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences; 1952. Issue 3, рр. 60–105. (In Russ.)

18. Tolstikhin O.N., Shepelev V.V., Nikitina N.M., et al. Permafrost hydrogeological conditions of Eastern Siberia. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1984. 191 p. (In Russ.)

19. Anisimova N.P. Cryohydrogeochemical features of the permafrost zone. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1981. 153 p. (In Russ.)

20. Pavlova N.A., Kolesnikov A B., Efremov V.S., et al. Groundwater chemistry in intrapermafrost taliks in Central Yakutia. Water Resources. 2016;43(2):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807816020135.

21. Shepelev V.V., Lomovtseva N.S. Lakes in the cryolithozone of the Bestyakhskaya Terrace along the Lena River and their interaction with groundwater. In: Thematic and regional studies of permafrost in Northern Eurasia. Yakutsk: Institute of Permafrost of the USSR Academy of Sciences; 1981, pp. 106–115. (In Russ.).

22. Shepelev V.V. Spring waters in Yakutia. Yakutsk: Yakutskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo Publ.; 1987. 127 p. (In Russ.).

23. Shepelev V.V. Suprapermafrost waters in the cryolithozone. Novosibirsk: Geo; 2011. 167 p. (In Russ.)

24. Semernya A.A., Gagarin L.A., Bazhin K.I. Cryohydrogeological features of the site of intrapermafrost aquifer distribution in the Eruu spring area (Central Yakutia). Earth’s Cryosphere. 2018;22(2):26–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21782/EC2541-9994-2018-2(26-34)

25. Porter C., Howat I., Noh M.-J., et al. “ArcticDEM – Strips, Version 4.1”.Version 1. 2022: Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/C98DVS.

26. Price D.T., McKenney D.W., Nalder I.A., et al. A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2000;101(2-3):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s01681923(99)00169-0.

27. Nitze I., Grosse G., Jones B.M., et al. Landsat-based trend analysis of lake dynamics across northern permafrost regions. Remote Sensing. 2017;9(7):640. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9070640.