Remote seismic monitoring of the of the first stage of the Vilyui HPP cascade using records from the “Chernyshevsky” seismic station

Advancements in digital seismic signal processing have significantly enhanced the ability to analyze low-amplitude signals from both natural and anthropogenic sources. This article investigates the potential for remotely detecting seismic signals generated by operating equipment at the first and second stages of the Vilyui Hydroelectric Power Plant cascades (HPP-1 and HPP-2) within the engineering and geological conditions of the permafrost region. The study employs methods and software developed by the Federal Research Center “Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences”. Seismic data from the Yakut Regional Seismological Centre network, including records from the “Chernyshevsky” seismic station and the Vilyui HPP-1 and HPP-2 located 1.256 kilometers and 1.456 kilometers away, respectively—were processed. Averaged spectral graphs of seismic signals over various time intervals were constructed, revealing numerous monochromatic signals. Analysis of these graphs, combined with technical documentation for the Vilyui HPP-1 and HPP-2 equipment, enabled the establishment of correlations between the processed signal and the operational characteristics of the equipment. An analysis of an emergency event on March 4, 2023, caused by incorrect operation of the control systems for the generating equipment at the Vilyui HPP-1 and HPP-2, confirmed that the identified signals are related to the generating equipment. The deviations of the operating equipment frequencies from their nominal values, along with the timing of technical malfunctions, were identified. In conclusion, the methodology was assessed and confirmed to be appropriate for conducting seismic and geotechnical monitoring of engineering structures located in permafrost environments.

1. Sudakova M.S., Brushkov A.V., Velikin S.A., et al. Geophysical methods in permafrost monitoring. Moscow University Geol. Bull. 2022;(6):141–151. (In Russ.)

2. Trifonov B.A., Milanovskii S.Yu., Nesynov V.V. Geophysical methods for the study of natural and human-induced changes in ground massifs of the permafrost zone. Geoekolo­ giya. Inzhenernaya Geologiya. Gidrogeologiya. 2024;(5):82– 94. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869780924050087. (In Russ.)

3. Emanov A.F., Emanov A.A., Poljanskiy P.O., et al. Seismic impacts to Novosibirsk hydroelectric dam. Mining Sciences: Fundamental and Applied Issues. 2023;10(3):50–55. https://doi.org/10.15372/FPVGN2023100308. (In Russ.)

4. Zhang R.V., Velikin S.A., Shesternev D.M. Temperature and cryogenic regime of the Vilyuyskaya hydroelectric power station-1, 2: geocryological monitoring. Hydraulic Structures Construction. 2017;(6):10–23. (In Russ.)

5. Bakh A.A., Emanov A.F., Sheboltasov A.G., et al. Highprecision determinations of the characteristics of natural oscillations of medium-pressure hydroelectric power station dams by the standing wave method. Problems of Engineering Seismology. 2025;52(1):120–131. https://doi.org/10.21455/VIS2025.1-6. (In Russ.)

6. Korolenko D.B., Kuzmenko A.P., Moskvichev V.V., Saburov V.S. Information system for seismometric monitoring of technical condition of hydraulic structures: experience in modelling, development and implementation. Computational Technologies. 2019;24(5):13–37. https://doi.org/10.25743/ICT.2019.24.5.003. (In Russ.)

7. GOST R 55260.1.5-2012 Hydro power plants. Part 1-5. Hydrotechnical constructions of hydroelectric power stations. Requirements for projection in seismic areas. Registered 07.01.2014; published 03.04.2023 / Zotova G.V., Prusakova V.N., Mentova R.A. (In Russ.)

8. Seleznev V.S., Liseikin A.V., Kokovkin I.V., Solovyov V.M. Change in natural oscilaton frequencies of buildings and structures depending on external factors. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2024;65(7):1036–1044. https://doi.org/10.15372/GiG2024102. (In Russ.)

9. Patent No. 2461847, Russian Federation, IPC G01V 1/28 G01M 7/02. A method for continuous monitoring of the physical condition of buildings and a method for continuous monitoring of the physical condition of buildings and/or structures and a device for its implementation: No. 2010128394/28; registered 07.08.2010; published 09.20.2012 / Seleznev V.S., Lisekin A.V., Bryksin A.A. (In Russ.)

10. Liseikin A.V., Seleznev V.S. An approach for remote control of destructive processes by low-amplitude seismic signals during service of large industrial facilities. Problems of Engineering Seismology. 2024;51(3):86–106. https://doi.org/10.21455/VIS2024.3-5. (In Russ.)

11. Bryksin A.A., Gromyko P.V., Sevostyanov D.B. Using the Baikal-8 recorders for seismic monitoring of buildings and structures in real time in Seismological Branch of the GS RAS. Russian Journal of Seismology. 2022;4(3):68–80. https:// doi. org/10.35540/2686-7907.2022.3.06. (In Russ.)

12. Lapparova I. F. A new stage in the energy development of Yakutia from the late 50s to the 80s of the twentieth century. In: Rodnina N.V., et al. (eds.) Agrarian science: from philosophy to economics : Collection of scientific articles at the intrauniversity scientific and practical conference of the Faculty of Economics, dedicated to the 65th anniversary of higher agricultural education in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the Yakut ASSR, Yakutsk, October 03, 2022. Yakutsk: NEFU Publishing House; 2022, pp. 119–121. (In Russ.)

13. Dvoretskaya M.I., Zhdanova A.P., Lushnikov O.G., Sliva I.V. Renewable energy. Hydroelectric power plants of Russia. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic University Publishing House. 2018. 224 p. (In Russ.)

14. Development of seismic methods for monitoring the geomechanical condition of the Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2025;66(2):247–256. https://doi.org/10.15372/GIG2024155. (In Russ.)

15. Website of the Lena Department of Rostechnadzor. Available at: https://lensk.gosnadzor.ru (accessed: 09.04.2025) (In Russ.)

16. Abramov A.A. Reconstruction of 110 kV electrical networks in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) in connection with the connection of the substation Machchoba: Bachelor’s thesis, Blagoveshchensk. 2021. 118 p. (In Russ.)

17. Neklyudov V.V. Identification of the engineering geological structures of permafrost rocks by means of nonstandard engineering seismic methods. Prospect and Protection of Mineral Resources. 2014;(3):37–42. (In Russ.)

18. Zhang R.V., Velikin S.A., Kuznetsov G.I., Kruk N.V. Embankment dams in the Russian permafrost zone. Novosibirsk: Geo Publ. 2019. 427 p. https://doi.org/10.21782/B978-5-60430211-8. (In Russ.)

19. Velikin S. A., Snegirev A.M. Local geophysical monitoring of the right-bank continuity of the dam at the Vilyuy Hydroelectric Power Plant. Bulletin KRASEC. Sciences of the Earth. 2005;2(6):77–85. (In Russ.)

20. Seismological Bulletin (network of teleseismic stations), 2020. (2024). Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GS RAS) [website] Available at: http://www.gsras.ru/ftp/Teleseismic_bulletin/2020 / (accessed: 04.09.2025) (In Russ.)

21. Certificate of State Registration for Computer Programme No. 2021666241 Russian Federation. SpectrumSeism : No. 2021665611 : registered 11.10.2021 : published 11.10.2021 / Seleznev V.S., Liseikin A.V., Sevostyanov D.B., Bryksin A.A. (In Russ.)

22. Seleznev V.S., Liseikin A.V., Alzhanov R.Sh., Gromyko P.V. The effect of the operation of hydraulic units on the natural vibrations of the Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP dam. Hydraulic Structures Construction. 2013;(7):2–7. (In Russ.)

23. NPO ‘ELSIB’ PAO. Available at: https://elsib.ru/ru/services/gidrogeneratory/ (accessed: 09.04.2025) (In Russ.)